Judicial Integrity: Breaking Laws, Shattering Public Trust

When judges break the law, they are deemed to have committed judicial misconduct, which is a serious breach of judicial ethics. In the US, state and local judges have repeatedly escaped public accountability for misdeeds that have harmed thousands. A Reuters investigation found that nine out of ten judges kept their jobs, including an Alabama judge who unlawfully jailed hundreds of poor people, many of them Black, over traffic fines. While there are processes to file complaints and hold judges accountable, the system tends to favour protecting the rights and reputations of judges, while overlooking the impact of their wrongdoing on those affected by it.

Judges can break the law by lying under oath.

Judges Can Break the Law by Lying Under Oath

Lying under oath is a criminal offense known as perjury, and it applies to everyone, including judges. Perjury involves intentionally providing false information or misleading statements while under oath, and it carries severe consequences.

Judges are always under oath in the courtroom, and if they lie, they commit perjury. Perjury is a serious breach of judicial ethics and is considered judicial misconduct. It undermines the integrity of the legal system, as it introduces an element of unpredictability and disrupts the balance and uniformity that the legal system strives for.

The consequences of perjury for individuals can be significant. It can result in criminal charges, fines, probation, or even imprisonment, depending on the jurisdiction and the severity of the crime. Perjury irreparably damages the credibility of the individual, making their testimony questionable and affecting their reliability in any legal context.

In the case of judges, perjury is a deviation from the accepted practices of the judicial profession. It can lead to various consequences, including public reprimand, additional education, suspension with or without pay, or even removal from office in serious instances.

To prove judicial misconduct, including perjury, individuals can file a complaint. The process typically involves obtaining and filing a pre-established complaint form, which is then reviewed by a Chief Judge to determine if further investigation is warranted. If an investigation is deemed necessary, a special committee is appointed to look into the claim, and their findings are submitted to the Judicial Council in the district for a decision on the appropriate remedial steps.

Judges can be guilty of judicial misconduct, including bribery, bias, or abuse of power

Judges are expected to uphold the highest standards of conduct and fairness. However, they are human, and instances of judicial misconduct do occur. Judicial misconduct is a serious matter that can undermine the public's trust in the judiciary and compromise the integrity of the legal system.

Judicial misconduct can take many forms, including bribery, bias, and abuse of power. Bribery occurs when a judge accepts money or other gifts in exchange for a particular decision. This is a serious offence and can result in criminal charges. Corruption refers to any form of abuse of power, such as using their position to gain personal benefits or favours. For example, a judge may use their office to obtain special treatment for relatives or friends or accept bribes, gifts, or other personal favours related to their office.

Bias is another form of judicial misconduct. Judges are expected to be impartial and fair in their decisions. However, bias can occur when a judge allows personal relationships, financial interests, or other factors to influence their conduct or judgment. For instance, a judge should disqualify themselves from a proceeding if they have a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party or personal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts.

Abuse of power can manifest in various ways, such as engaging in improper ex parte communication, failing to execute judicial duties in a timely manner, or behaving in a harassing, abusive, prejudiced, or biased manner. Ex parte communications occur when a judge speaks to one party without the presence of the other party or their attorney, creating an unfair advantage. Additionally, judges have a duty to perform their duties with respect for others and are prohibited from engaging in harassing, abusive, or biased behaviour.

In summary, judicial misconduct, including bribery, bias, and abuse of power, is a breach of the ethical and legal obligations of judges to remain impartial and fair. It undermines the integrity of the judiciary and erodes public trust in the justice system. Holding judges accountable for their actions is crucial to ensuring that the legal system upholds the highest standards of conduct and fairness.

Judges can be disciplined or removed from office for serious instances of judicial misconduct

Judges are not immune from punishment for breaking the law. Judicial misconduct is a serious breach of judicial ethics, and judges can be disciplined or removed from office for serious instances of it. A judicial misconduct case can be initiated when an individual files a complaint regarding the conduct of a judge. This can include a range of behaviours, such as using their office to obtain special treatment for friends or family, accepting bribes or gifts, engaging in improper ex parte communication, partisan political activity, or making inappropriate partisan statements.

In the United States, each state has an oversight agency that investigates misconduct complaints against judges. These agencies can pursue discipline ranging from reprimand to removal from office. While the authority of these agencies differs from state to state, most require approval from a panel that includes other judges to remove a judge from office.

In practice, judges are rarely removed from office for misconduct. A Reuters investigation found that, in the past dozen years, nine out of ten judges who broke laws or oaths kept their jobs. This is due in part to the limited power of oversight agencies and the differing disciplinary procedures between states.

In addition to removal from office, judges found guilty of misconduct may face a range of other consequences, including reprimand, suspension (with or without pay), additional education, or mentoring/monitoring.

Judges can face suspension, reprimand, or additional education for misconduct

Judges are expected to uphold the law, but in some cases, they break the law or engage in judicial misconduct. Judicial misconduct is a serious breach of judicial ethics and can include actions such as bribery, bias, or abuse of power. When judges are found guilty of misconduct, they can face a range of consequences, including suspension, reprimand, or additional education.

Suspension is a common consequence for judges who engage in misconduct. This can involve temporarily removing the judge from their position, with or without pay, for a specified period. The length of the suspension may vary depending on the severity of the misconduct and can range from a few months to several years. In some cases, the suspension may be unpaid, resulting in financial consequences for the judge.

Reprimand is another possible consequence, which involves publicly criticizing the judge for their unethical behavior. This can be done through a formal statement or announcement, expressing disapproval of the judge's actions and serving as a deterrent for future misconduct.

In some cases, judges may be required to undergo additional education as a corrective measure. This could involve attending training programs or workshops to enhance their knowledge of judicial ethics and the law. The aim is to ensure that the judge understands the consequences of their actions and is better equipped to make ethical decisions in the future.

While these consequences are intended to address misconduct and promote accountability, it is important to note that not all instances of judicial misconduct are reported or investigated. In some cases, judges may face minimal consequences or retain their positions despite engaging in unethical behavior. This can erode public trust in the judiciary and underscore the need for robust oversight and accountability measures.

Overall, judicial misconduct can have significant implications, and judges who engage in such behavior may face suspension, reprimand, or additional education to address their actions and prevent future misconduct.

Judges can break the law by citing invalid laws or ignoring precedents

In the United States, judges are bound by a Code of Conduct, which includes ethical canons that apply to federal judges and provides guidance on their performance of official duties. The Code of Conduct for United States Judges was initially adopted by the Judicial Conference in 1973 and has since undergone several revisions, with the most recent changes adopted in March 2019.

Firstly, lower court judges who fail to follow precedent are often criticized by appellate judges or justices, who may overturn their ruling. Secondly, decisions that deviate from precedent are often scrutinized and criticized by legal scholars in law reviews and treatises. Additionally, lower-court judges who consistently fail to follow precedents are less likely to be recommended by senior judges for promotion to appellate positions.

However, it is important to note that the power to appoint judges to appellate positions lies with politicians rather than other judges, which may reduce the impact of this factor. Ultimately, only judges at the highest level, such as the Supreme Court of a state or the US Supreme Court, are expected to alter precedents, and even then, it is done reluctantly.

Furthermore, while there may not be specific US federal or state statutes mandating that judges follow precedent, the concept of precedent is deeply rooted in the common law system, which forms the basis of US law. Deviating from precedent can lead to a "split circuit," where different circuit courts interpret the law differently, ultimately requiring the US Supreme Court to intervene and create binding precedent for all courts.

In conclusion, while judges can break the law by citing invalid laws or ignoring precedents, such actions constitute judicial misconduct and can have significant consequences, including criticism, reduced career prospects, and the need for higher courts to intervene and resolve discrepancies.

Frequently asked questions