Alabama's Abortion Law: Understanding The Strict Regulations

Abortion is illegal in Alabama unless there is a serious health risk to the pregnant woman. In 2019, the state enacted a near-total abortion ban called the Human Life Protection Act, which is one of the most restrictive abortion laws in the US. The law prohibits all abortions unless medically necessary to avoid a serious health risk to the pregnant woman, and there are no exceptions for cases involving rape, incest, or human trafficking. In June 2022, following the US Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, Alabama began enforcing its total abortion ban.

The Human Life Protection Act

The Act was introduced into Alabama's Lower House on April 2, 2019, and was signed into law by then-Governor Kay Ivey on May 16, 2019. The bill passed the Lower House on April 30, the Senate on May 14, and was one of the nation's most restrictive abortion laws at the time.

The Act also removed previous exemptions for cases of incest or rape, and mental illness in mothers was also not considered sufficient to provide an exception. These restrictions made the bill one of the most aggressive anti-abortion laws in American history.

The penalties outlined in the Act focus on those who perform an illegal abortion. The state will not file criminal charges against a pregnant woman who has an abortion. However, physicians and other healthcare workers found in violation of the law face felony charges and years in prison. Committing an illegal abortion is charged as a Class A felony, punishable by 10 to 99 years in prison, while attempting an illegal abortion is charged as a Class C felony, punishable by one to 10 years in prison.

The Act also includes mandatory waiting periods, parental consent requirements for minors, and stringent guidelines for abortion clinics, which many advocates argue are designed to limit the availability of abortion services in the state.

Roe v. Wade

The Supreme Court's decision in Roe was among the most controversial in U.S. history. The decision struck down many abortion laws, and caused an ongoing abortion debate in the United States about whether, or to what extent, abortion should be legal, who should decide the legality of abortion, and what the role of moral and religious views in the political sphere should be. The decision also shaped debate concerning which methods the Supreme Court should use in constitutional adjudication.

The Supreme Court's ruling in Roe v. Wade meant that the state could no longer regulate abortion in the first trimester. The decision also introduced the concept of a constitutional "right to privacy" that it said had been intimated in earlier decisions. The Court reasoned that outlawing abortions would infringe a pregnant woman's right to privacy for several reasons, including that having unwanted children "may force upon the woman a distressful life and future".

In June 2022, the Supreme Court overruled Roe and Casey in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization on the grounds that the substantive right to abortion was not "deeply rooted in this Nation's history or tradition", nor considered a right when the Due Process Clause was ratified in 1868. As of June 24, 2022, with the Supreme Court's overturning of Roe v. Wade, abortion in Alabama became illegal except when the life of the pregnant individual is in danger.

Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization

The Supreme Court, in a divided opinion, upheld the Mississippi law and overturned Roe v. Wade (1973) and Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992). The Court concluded that the Constitution does not protect the right to an abortion and returned the issue of abortion regulation to elected branches and individual states.

The Majority Opinion

The majority opinion, authored by Justice Samuel Alito, held that the Constitution makes no reference to abortion and that no such right is implicitly protected by any constitutional provision, including the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Alito wrote that any right not mentioned in the Constitution "must be 'deeply rooted in this Nation's history and tradition' and 'implicit in the concept of ordered liberty.'" He further argued that until the latter part of the 20th century, there was no support in American law for a constitutional right to obtain an abortion.

Alito also criticised the Roe v. Wade decision, stating that it "imposed the same highly restrictive regime on the entire Nation" and effectively struck down the abortion laws of every state. He concluded that the Court's decision in Dobbs would "return the issue of abortion to the people's elected representatives."

The Concurring Opinions

Justices Thomas and Kavanaugh filed concurring opinions. Chief Justice Roberts concurred in the judgment, agreeing to uphold the Mississippi law but criticising the majority for deciding the broader question of overruling Roe and Casey. He would have preferred to leave that constitutional question to a future case.

The Dissenting Opinion

Justices Breyer, Kagan, and Sotomayor wrote a joint dissenting opinion, criticising the Court for unsettling nearly five decades of precedent and undermining the Constitution's promise of freedom and equality for women. They argued that the Court's decision curtails women's rights and their status as free and equal citizens. The dissent also expressed concern that the majority's reasoning could threaten other constitutional rights related to bodily integrity, familial relationships, and procreation.

The Impact on Alabama

The Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization directly impacted Alabama, as it allowed the state's Human Life Protection Act to go into effect. This Act bans most abortions at any stage of pregnancy, with no exceptions for cases of rape or incest, only allowing abortions if there is a serious health risk to the mother. As a result, Alabama's remaining abortion clinics were ordered to cease operating, making abortion illegal in the state.

Alabama Supreme Court ruling on IVF

On February 16, 2024, the Alabama Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos used for in vitro fertilisation (IVF) should be considered "extrauterine children". This ruling has had a profound impact on IVF providers and patients in Alabama, who are now uncertain about the legal implications of the decision.

The ruling grants embryos the same legal status as born children, which calls into question many standard IVF practices. For example, providers may no longer be able to freeze, thaw, transfer, or test embryos using best medical practices. Additionally, people often create more embryos than they use, and it is now unclear if these extra embryos can be disposed of without legal repercussions.

The ruling has also sparked concerns about the potential for criminal liability. If an embryo does not survive the freeze-thaw process, for instance, physicians or embryologists could be charged with manslaughter or face wrongful death lawsuits.

The practical implications of the ruling are still being untangled, and IVF doctors in Alabama are awaiting legal guidance. However, some providers have already decided to halt IVF procedures due to the uncertainty and potential risks.

The decision has also sparked a broader debate about reproductive technology and abortion. Several other states have introduced measures that grant legal rights and protections to embryos or fetuses, often as part of anti-abortion efforts. Critics argue that these measures could effectively outlaw IVF procedures and restrict access to fertility treatments.

The Alabama Supreme Court's ruling specifically impacts IVF patients and providers in the state, but it has also drawn attention to the broader issue of reproductive rights and sparked discussions about the need for federal protections to ensure access to IVF treatments.

Alabama's definition of a serious health risk

Alabama's abortion laws are among the most restrictive in the United States. The state's abortion ban, the Human Life Protection Act, prohibits abortions at any stage of pregnancy unless there is a serious health risk to the pregnant woman.

Alabama defines a serious health risk as a condition that necessitates the termination of the pregnancy to preserve the life of the pregnant woman or avert a serious risk of substantial physical impairment of a major bodily function. This means that if a physician determines that continuing the pregnancy could result in significant harm to the pregnant woman's physical health, an abortion may be legally performed.

The Human Life Protection Act does not include exceptions for cases of rape, incest, or human trafficking. Additionally, Alabama's definition of abortion does not include procedures to terminate ectopic pregnancies or pregnancies with lethal anomalies.

The Act classifies the performance of an illegal abortion as a Class A felony, with doctors found guilty facing sentences ranging from 10 years to life imprisonment. The state will not file criminal charges against a pregnant woman who has an abortion, but physicians and other healthcare workers who violate the law may face felony charges and years in prison.

Frequently asked questions