Understanding Applicable Laws For Municipal Contracts

Municipal contracts are agreements entered into by a municipality for the sale or purchase of supplies, materials, equipment, or the rental thereof, or the construction, alteration, repair, or maintenance of real or personal property. The law that applies to municipal contracts depends on the location and the contract's specifics.

In the US, the Contract Clause of the Constitution prevents any state from passing a Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts. This means that no state can pass a law that affects existing contracts, including municipal contracts. However, this does not include judicial decisions, which are not considered laws in this context.

Additionally, each state has its own laws governing municipal contracts, which may include competitive bidding requirements, dollar limitations, and procedures for advertising and awarding contracts. For example, in Minnesota, the Uniform Municipal Contracting Law sets out the procedures for municipalities to follow when entering into contracts, including sealed bids, direct negotiations, and requests for proposals.

It's important to note that municipal contracts often include choice-of-law and choice-of-venue provisions, which allow the parties to select in advance which jurisdiction's law will apply to any contractual dispute and where any litigation will take place. These provisions can have a significant impact on the outcome of a dispute and should be carefully considered during contract negotiations.

Choice of Law

Choice-of-law provisions are contractual agreements that allow parties to select in advance which jurisdiction's law will apply to any disputes that may arise. For example, a contract may state that Pennsylvania law will apply in the event of a dispute, even if neither party is from Pennsylvania. Courts generally enforce such agreements. However, in the absence of a choice-of-law provision, courts will determine the applicable law by considering factors such as the interests of justice, the locations of the parties and critical events, and the interests of the respective jurisdictions.

When selecting a choice-of-law, it is important to be aware of critical differences between jurisdictions' laws. For instance, some courts may consider a three-year non-compete term to be unreasonably long, while others may not. Additionally, whether continued employment is sufficient compensation for a non-compete agreement may depend on the applicable law. For example, under Massachusetts law, continued employment is enough, while Pennsylvania law requires separate compensation such as a bonus or raise.

In an international context, agreeing to the application of another jurisdiction's laws can significantly change the terms of a deal. Therefore, it is advisable to seek legal assistance when negotiating commercial contracts to ensure a full understanding of the implications of different choice-of-law provisions.

Forum Selection

There are three main types of forum selection clauses:

• Specifying a particular court or jurisdiction: This type of clause indicates the state, court, or venue where the dispute must be litigated.
• Establishing a specific dispute resolution process: This relates to the type of process that must be used, such as arbitration or mediation.
• Defining both a court and dispute resolution process: These clauses determine both the resolution process and the specific litigation venue, including the court to resolve the issue if the initial process fails.

When drafting municipal contracts, it is essential to carefully consider forum selection clauses. They play a crucial role in determining the convenience, efficiency, and predictability of future litigation. By including these clauses, businesses can limit their risk, reduce litigation expenses, and avoid the threat of hostile foreign laws or jurisdictions.

Additionally, when choosing a legal forum, various factors come into play. The most common consideration is the convenience of all parties involved. Other rationales include jurisdiction over the parties, property, or witnesses; special dispute resolution processes; or the need for unique expertise due to complex subject matter.

In conclusion, forum selection clauses are a vital component of municipal contracts, providing clarity and certainty in the event of disputes. By carefully crafting these clauses, businesses can mitigate risks, reduce costs, and ensure a more predictable legal process.

Consent to Jurisdiction

Consent-to-jurisdiction clauses are contractual provisions in which the parties agree to litigate their disputes in a specified forum. In other words, they are provisions in which a party agrees that a selected jurisdiction can exercise jurisdiction over them in litigation.

A consent-to-jurisdiction clause can be distinguished from a jurisdiction provision, which is a contractual provision in which the parties agree to litigate their disputes in a specified forum, by the presence or absence of "language of exclusivity". Language of exclusivity is when contracting parties waive their right to bring a lawsuit elsewhere. For example, the use of the words "exclusive" or "sole" conveys the intent of exclusivity. Statements that a claim "must" be brought in a particular forum or that it "may only" be brought in that forum also suffice.

Consent-to-jurisdiction clauses are often found in contracts alongside jurisdiction provisions. For example, a contract might contain the following jurisdiction provision:

> Any legal suit, action or proceeding arising out of or based upon this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby may be instituted in the federal courts of the United States of America located in the Borough of Manhattan in the City of New York or the courts of the State of New York in each case located in the Borough of Manhattan in the City of New York (collectively, the "Specified Courts"), and each party irrevocably submits to the exclusive jurisdiction (except for proceedings instituted in regard to the enforcement of a judgment of any such court, as to which such jurisdiction is non-exclusive) of such courts in any such suit, action or proceeding.

This example is followed by a consent-to-jurisdiction provision:

> The parties hereto consent to and agree to submit to the jurisdiction of any of the courts specified herein and agree to accept service of process to vest personal jurisdiction over them in any of these courts.

Consent-to-jurisdiction provisions are not necessary, as the same result can be achieved with jurisdiction provisions. However, they are commonly included in contracts.

Contract Formation

A municipal corporation is a local-level state functionary that derives its power to govern from the state constitution, state statutes, or a legislative charter grant. A municipal corporation cannot act, contract, or incur liability without authorisation from the state. All acts performed by a municipal corporation beyond the scope of the powers granted to them are void.

Municipalities are authorised to execute contracts and are liable for any breach. When a state contracts, it is liable for any contracts made for its benefit like any private party. A state waives immunity from liability when it contracts with private citizens, but legislative consent is necessary to sue a state.

A council or governing body makes contracts on behalf of a municipality. The formal requisites of a binding contract are that it must:

• Comply with statutes or municipal charters requiring the formality of an ordinance
• Be in writing
• Be signed by a person authorised by the municipal council
• Be duly authorised by the board or council

Municipal contracts exceeding a certain monetary value must be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder furnishing the required security after advertisement for sealed bids. The exact monetary value varies depending on the type of contract and the municipality's location.

A contract is analyzable into two elements: the agreement, which comes from the parties, and the obligation, which comes from the law and makes the agreement binding on the parties. The obligation stems from the municipal law in existence when the contract is made. The remedial law, including the law of procedure, is also considered part of the law supplying the obligation of contracts.

Contract Execution

A municipal corporation is a corporation that performs certain state functions on a local level. It is granted powers by the state, and cannot act, make a contract, or incur liability without authorisation from the state.

When executing contracts, municipalities are assumed to be acting within the scope of their authority, and are liable for any breach. A council or governing body makes contracts on behalf of a municipality, and the municipality is bound by these contracts.

The formal requirements of a binding contract are that it:

• Must comply with statutes or municipal charters requiring the formality of an ordinance
• Must be in writing
• Must be signed by a person authorised by the municipal council
• Must be duly authorised by the board or the council

However, an irregular or unauthorised act by a municipal corporation can be corrected by subsequent ratification and confirmation.

In terms of contract execution, it is important to note that a contract may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which is deemed an original. For example, a contract may be executed in two or more counterparts, all of which are considered one and the same agreement. This is also true when a contract is executed via facsimile or electronic signature.

A mandatory forum selection clause will generally be enforced by courts if the parties have agreed to it and if it is fair and reasonable. The use of 'shall' in a forum selection clause indicates that the parties have agreed to a specific forum.

Municipal corporations have the power to execute contracts, but they must do so within the scope of their authority as granted by the state. Binding contracts must meet certain formal requirements, and any irregularities can be corrected. Contracts can be executed in multiple counterparts, and forum selection clauses are generally enforceable if they are fair and reasonable.

Frequently asked questions