Mark Meechan's Controversial Speech: Crossing Legal Boundaries?

In 2018, Mark Meechan, a Scottish YouTuber and comedian, was convicted of breaching the Communications Act 2003 by posting a video of his girlfriend's dog giving Nazi salutes and responding to statements such as gas the Jews. The video, titled M8 Yer Dugs A Nazi, was deemed grossly offensive and anti-Semitic and racist in nature, resulting in a fine of £800. This case sparked debates about free speech and the appropriateness of the law in addressing modern issues.

Mark Meechan's video was judged to be grossly offensive

Mark Meechan, a Scottish YouTuber, comedian, and former candidate for the European Parliament, was convicted of being "grossly offensive" under the Communications Act 2003. The video in question, titled "M8 Yer Dugs A Nazi", showed Meechan teaching his girlfriend's dog to raise its paw in the manner of a Nazi salute and to react to the phrase "Do you wanna gas the Jews?". The video also included footage of a speech by Adolf Hitler and images of Hitler with the dog depicted with a toothbrush moustache similar to Hitler's.

The video was judged to be "grossly offensive" and in breach of the Communications Act 2003 by Sheriff Derek O'Carroll at Airdrie Sheriff Court. The court ruled that Meechan's claim that the video was a joke intended for his girlfriend "lacked credibility" as Meechan's girlfriend did not subscribe to the YouTube channel on which the video was posted. The court found that Meechan's video was "grossly offensive and contained menacing, anti-Semitic and racist material". The video was found to have explicitly and exclusively referred to Jews, the Holocaust, and the role of the Nazis in the death of 6 million Jews in a grossly offensive manner.

The judgement sparked debates and discussions about free speech and the limits of the law. Some commentators argued that the law was badly worded and wholly unfit for purpose, while others defended the conviction, stating that Meechan's video was not a joke and was intended to give offense. The case also received attention from public figures, including British comedians Ricky Gervais and David Baddiel, who supported Meechan, and Rabbi Abraham Cooper, associate dean of the Simon Wiesenthal Centre, who stated that while the offence did not deserve jail time, Meechan should be sentenced to meet with Holocaust survivors and World War II veterans.

The video was also judged to be menacing, anti-Semitic and racist

In 2016, Mark Meechan posted a video on YouTube titled "M8 Yer Dugs A Nazi", in which he trained his girlfriend's dog to perform a Nazi salute and respond to statements such as "gas the Jews". The video was viewed as a demonstration of dog training as well as a comedy sketch. However, it was also considered offensive and sparked debates about free speech.

The video was judged to be "grossly offensive" and in breach of the Communications Act 2003, leading to Meechan's arrest and conviction. The court ruled that the video contained menacing, anti-Semitic, and racist content. The judge, Sheriff Derek O'Carroll, stated that the video "explicitly and exclusively referred to Jews, the Holocaust, and the role of the Nazis in the death of six million Jews in a grossly offensive manner." He added that Meechan "knew or must have known" the risk of causing offence to Jewish people.

Meechan defended his actions by stating that the video was intended as a joke to annoy his girlfriend and not to be taken seriously. He argued that it was a form of satire and that his freedom of expression had been restricted. However, the court found that Meechan's claim of it being a joke lacked credibility, as his girlfriend was not a subscriber to his YouTube channel. The video was also analysed under Section 127 of the Communications Act 2003, which states that a person is guilty of an offence if they send a "grossly offensive or indecent, obscene or menacing" message through a public electronic communications network.

The case sparked discussions about the fine line between causing offence and threatening behaviour or inciting hatred. It also brought attention to the need for clear and appropriate legislation to address modern issues, such as offensive material appearing on online platforms like YouTube.

Meechan was fined £800

In April 2018, Mark Meechan was fined £800 after being found guilty of posting grossly offensive, antisemitic, and racist material online, in breach of the Communications Act 2003. The content in question was a video of Meechan teaching his girlfriend's dog to perform a Nazi salute and respond to statements such as "gas the Jews". The video was viewed as grossly offensive within Jewish communities in Scotland and was considered to normalise antisemitic attitudes and provoke further unpleasant antisemitic messages.

Meechan's case sparked controversy and discussions about free speech. Meechan himself stated that he believed there had been a "huge miscarriage of justice" and that it was a "dark day" for freedom of speech and freedom of expression. He argued that the verdict disregarded the context and intent of the video, which he maintained was intended as a joke to annoy his girlfriend.

In response to the verdict, Meechan initially stated that he would not pay the fine, instead donating £800 to the Glasgow Children's Hospital Charity. However, in March 2019, the money was seized from his bank account by an arrestment order.

Meechan attempted to appeal the conviction, but his request was denied by a member of the Sheriff Appeal Court, who also accused Meechan's lawyer of contempt. The letter stated that the appeal was "not arguable" due to the nature of the "deeply unpleasant offence".

Meechan's case received support from several British comedians, including Ricky Gervais and David Baddiel, as well as various other public figures. However, the Scottish Council of Jewish Communities welcomed the conviction, stating that Meechan's video was not a joke and that he had made clear his intention to give offence.

Meechan's defence was that the video was a joke intended for his girlfriend

Mark Meechan, a Scottish YouTuber, comedian, and former candidate for the European Parliament, was convicted of being "grossly offensive" under the Communications Act 2003. He posted a video of his girlfriend's dog giving a Nazi salute and responding to statements such as "gas the Jews" by appearing distressed. Meechan's defence was that the video was a joke intended for his girlfriend. However, the court ruled that this defence lacked credibility as Meechan's girlfriend did not subscribe to the YouTube channel where the video was posted. The video was deemed to contain anti-Semitic, and racist material and Meechan was fined £800.

Meechan's case sparked debates about free speech and the limits of humour. Some supported Meechan, arguing that his video was a joke and should be protected as free speech. Others, including the Scottish Council of Jewish Communities, argued that the video was offensive and intended to cause offence, regardless of Meechan's stated intention.

Meechan's defence that the video was a joke intended for his girlfriend was not accepted by the court. The sheriff who heard the case concluded that the video was made to drive traffic to Meechan's YouTube channel and that Meechan would have known that it would cause offence to Jewish people. The court's decision highlighted the subjective nature of humour and the challenge of determining intent in such cases.

The case also raised questions about the applicability of the Communications Act 2003 to online content. The law was originally designed to protect individuals from grossly offensive personal telephone calls and telegrams but is now used to police the internet. This has led to concerns that the law is not appropriately worded to deal with modern issues and may restrict freedom of speech online.

Meechan's case has highlighted the complexities of balancing free speech and the protection of individuals from offensive and harmful content, especially in the context of evolving technology and changing social norms. It has sparked debates about the role of context, intent, and the potential for humour to be used as a defence in such cases. Ultimately, the court's decision in this case set a precedent for interpreting the Communications Act 2003 and the boundaries of acceptable speech in the UK.

The court ruled that Meechan's defence lacked credibility

In 2018, Mark Meechan, a Scottish YouTuber, comedian, and former candidate for the European Parliament, was convicted of breaching the Communications Act 2003. The Act states that:

> A person is guilty of an offence if he—

> (a) sends by means of a public electronic communications network a message or other matter that is grossly offensive or of an indecent, obscene or menacing character.

Meechan posted a video on YouTube of his girlfriend's dog, a pug, performing a Nazi salute and responding to statements such as "gas the Jews". The video was titled "M8 Yer Dugs A Nazi". In the video, Meechan explains that his girlfriend "is always ranting and raving about how cute and adorable her wee dog is, so I thought I would turn him into the least cute thing I could think of, which is a Nazi."

Meechan was arrested and charged with being "grossly offensive" under the Communications Act 2003. He was convicted of breaching the Act and fined £800, with no prison sentence. The court ruled that Meechan's defence—that the video was a joke intended for his girlfriend—lacked credibility. The court found that Meechan's girlfriend did not subscribe to the YouTube channel on which the video was posted. Additionally, the court noted that Meechan had no need to post the video on a public channel if his sole intention was to annoy his girlfriend. The video went viral, and Meechan made no effort to restrict public access or take down the video.

The court's decision sparked debates about free speech and the interpretation of the Communications Act 2003. Some argued that the law was too broad and restrictive, while others supported the conviction on the grounds that Meechan's actions were offensive and caused harm. The case highlighted the challenges of balancing freedom of expression with the need to protect individuals and communities from harmful and offensive content, particularly in the context of the internet and social media.

Frequently asked questions