Hyde Amendment: Federal Money And Abortion Laws

In the United States, the Hyde Amendment is a legislative provision that prevents federal funds from being used to pay for abortions. The amendment was first passed in 1976 and has been re-enacted annually since then, with some exceptions. While the Hyde Amendment does allow for federal funding for abortions in cases of rape, incest, or to save the life of the woman, it has been criticised for disproportionately affecting low-income women, women of colour, younger women, and immigrants. The amendment has also been the subject of legal challenges and political debates, with some advocating for its repeal.

The Hyde Amendment

Critics of the Hyde Amendment argue that it disproportionately affects low-income women, women of colour, younger women, and immigrants, as an estimated 42% of abortion recipients live below the poverty line. Since the passage of the amendment, more than one million women have been unable to afford abortions, and 18 to 33% of Medicaid-eligible women who desire abortions have given birth because they live in states that do not provide funding.

Proponents of the amendment state that it is supported by a majority of the American public and that it reflects the government's commitment to restricting tax money from funding abortions. However, opponents argue that the Hyde Amendment is a dangerous and unfair policy that allows politicians to interfere in people's personal healthcare decisions and restricts access to abortion services, particularly for marginalized communities.

Medicaid funding

The Hyde Amendment, first passed in 1976 and implemented in 1977, is a legislative provision that prevents federal funds from being used for abortions. The only exceptions to this law are abortions that are deemed medically necessary, such as when the pregnancy endangers the life of the pregnant person, or is the result of rape or incest. This amendment has been attached as a rider to the annual Congressional appropriations bill for the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and has been renewed annually by Congress.

The Hyde Amendment has had a significant impact on Medicaid funding for abortions. Medicaid is a joint federal-state health program that provides coverage for individuals with low incomes, including a significant number of women of colour and women with low incomes who have higher rates of abortion. Since the Hyde Amendment blocks federal funding for abortions, many states have had to use their own state funds to cover the cost of abortions for Medicaid enrollees. As of August 2023, 17 states have a policy of using their own funds to pay for all or most medically necessary abortions for Medicaid enrollees. Nine of these states do so as a result of a court order, while eight provide the funds voluntarily.

The impact of the Hyde Amendment on Medicaid funding for abortions varies depending on the state. In most states, Medicaid coverage for abortion is limited to cases of life endangerment, rape, or incest. However, some states have enacted laws or policies that further restrict abortion access, even in these exceptional cases. For example, South Dakota's Medicaid program does not cover abortion even in cases of rape or incest, which is a violation of federal law. On the other hand, some states have expanded abortion coverage under Medicaid beyond the Hyde Amendment requirements. Four states provide state funds for abortions in cases of fetal impairment, and four others provide funds for abortions necessary to prevent long-lasting damage to the person's physical health.

The lack of Medicaid coverage for abortions can create significant financial barriers for individuals seeking abortions, particularly those with low incomes. Without coverage, people may have to pay out-of-pocket for the procedure, which can be challenging for those who cannot afford it. This has disproportionately affected low-income women, women of colour, younger women, and immigrants, as abortion recipients are more likely to live below the poverty line.

Federal employees and their families

The Hyde Amendment, first passed in 1976, is a legislative provision that bars the use of federal funds to pay for abortions. This amendment has been re-enacted every year since 1976, with varying exceptions. The Hyde Amendment restricts abortion coverage for specific groups, including federal employee families.

The Hyde Amendment was introduced by Illinois Republican Congressman Henry J. Hyde and was passed by Congress in 1977, four years after the Roe v. Wade decision. The amendment was named for its chief sponsor, Republican Congressman Henry Hyde of Illinois. The measure was one of the first major legislative gains for the anti-abortion movement following the 1973 Supreme Court decision in Roe v. Wade.

The amendment has had a significant impact on federal employee families seeking abortion services. Due to the amendment, federal employee health plans do not cover abortion procedures. This means that federal employees and their families must pay out-of-pocket for abortion care, even if they cannot afford to do so. This restriction applies to all federal employees, including those in the military, federal prisons, and the Peace Corps.

Since its introduction, the Hyde Amendment has been modified several times. The current version of the amendment, adopted in 1997, allows for some exceptions to the ban on federal funding for abortions. Federal funds can be used for abortion in cases of rape, incest, or life endangerment. However, the life exception is narrowly defined to permit payment only when the woman's life is threatened by a "physical disorder, physical injury, or physical illness, including a life-endangering physical condition caused by or arising from the pregnancy itself."

In addition to the Hyde Amendment, other laws and policies also impact the availability of federal funding for abortions. For example, the No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion and Abortion Insurance Full Disclosure Act of 2021 prohibits the use of federal funds for abortions or health coverage that includes abortions. This bill also prohibits abortions from being provided in a federal health care facility or by a federal employee.

The restrictions on federal funding for abortions have had a significant impact on access to abortion services for many people, including federal employees and their families. These restrictions have been particularly harmful to low-income individuals and families, as well as communities of color, who may struggle to afford the cost of an abortion. As a result, some individuals may resort to unsafe methods or seek care from untrained or unlicensed practitioners.

Military personnel and their families

Following the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, the Department of Defense (DoD) announced critical changes to safeguard abortion and birth control access for service members and their families. These changes include providing allowances for travel and lodging for those seeking abortion care outside of the military and standardizing administrative absence policies to ensure service members can take time off to travel. The DoD has also extended the timeframe for service members to report a positive pregnancy test, giving them more time to evaluate their options before notifying their commander.

Despite these changes, federal law still prohibits the DoD from providing abortion services at military treatment facilities (MTFs) except in cases of rape, incest, or when the pregnant person's life is at risk. This ban includes the use of Tricare to cover abortion costs, except under the same limited circumstances. These restrictions present a significant barrier to abortion care for service members and their dependents, regardless of where they are stationed.

Advocates for abortion rights argue that access to safe and legal abortion is essential for military members and their families to have control over their bodies and futures. They emphasize that military personnel, who have bravely served their country, should not be denied their reproductive rights and should have access to comprehensive healthcare, including abortion care.

The impact of abortion restrictions falls disproportionately on people who already face barriers to accessing healthcare, including low-income individuals, people of color, junior service members, and those living in rural or medically underserved areas. As a result, some military members may struggle to afford abortion care, potentially forcing them to forgo basic necessities or resort to unsafe alternatives.

Native Americans and Alaskan Natives

The Hyde Amendment, passed in 1976, is a legislative provision that prevents federal funds from being used to pay for abortions. The only exceptions are when the pregnancy poses a threat to the mother's life, or in cases of rape or incest. This amendment has been altered several times since its inception, with the most recent changes in 1993, which expanded the exceptions to include cases of rape and incest.

Native American women and Alaskan Natives have been disproportionately affected by the Hyde Amendment. The Indian Health Service (IHS) is the primary source of reproductive healthcare for many Native Americans and Alaskan Natives. The IHS receives federal funding and is therefore subject to the Hyde Amendment's restrictions on abortion services. This means that Native American women and Alaskan Natives often have limited access to abortion services, even in cases where their life is endangered or the pregnancy resulted from rape or incest.

The restrictions on the use of federal funds for abortion through the IHS amount to a systematic infringement on the reproductive rights of Native American women and Alaskan Natives. Native American women experience high rates of sexual assault, adolescent pregnancy, and unintended pregnancy. The lack of access to abortion services can have serious consequences for their health and well-being.

Furthermore, the history of coerced sterilisation of Native American women by the IHS and collaborating physicians in the 1960s and 1970s has left a legacy of mistrust towards the US government and healthcare providers among Native American communities. This history, combined with the ongoing restrictions on abortion access, highlights the systemic infringement on the reproductive rights and justice of Native American women and Alaskan Natives.

Frequently asked questions