Job Applications: Is My Father-In-Law Considered Immediate Family?

When applying for a job, it's not uncommon for companies to ask whether you have any relatives working for them. This is because some companies have anti-nepotism policies in place to prevent conflicts of interest, favouritism, and accusations of nepotism. In the US, for example, a public official may not appoint, employ, promote, or advance a relative in their agency. However, having a relative working for a company can sometimes work in your favour, as it may result in a courtesy interview or priority in the hiring process. Ultimately, whether a father-in-law is considered family depends on the company's definition of relatives in their employment of relatives policy.

A father-in-law is considered family when applying for a job

When applying for a job, a father-in-law is generally considered family or a relative. Whether or not this is a problem depends on the company's stance on hiring individuals related by blood or marriage. Some companies have anti-nepotism policies in place to prevent conflicts of interest, favouritism, and accusations of nepotism. Others may encourage the employment of relatives, believing it can increase loyalty and provide access to qualified candidates.

In the US, it is common for relatives to receive priority when applying for a job at a company where they already have a family member working. This can result in a courtesy interview, even if the candidate does not meet all the role requirements. However, many companies also have rules against relatives working in the same department or in a supervisory/reporting relationship to avoid potential issues.

If you are applying for a job where a relative is already employed, it is essential to be transparent about the relationship. Some companies may require you to report this to HR or include it in your application. Failure to disclose this information could result in disciplinary action.

Companies may have anti-nepotism policies

Many companies have anti-nepotism policies in place to prevent conflicts of interest, favouritism, and unfair treatment of employees. These policies are designed to ensure that employees are treated fairly and are given opportunities based on their qualifications, rather than personal relationships.

An anti-nepotism policy is a set of rules and guidelines that prevent the hiring or promotion of family members or close relatives of current employees or management. This typically includes spouses, children, parents, siblings, and in-laws, as well as other extended family members and domestic partners. The policy may prohibit family members from supervising each other, having influence over recruitment, salary, or promotion, or otherwise benefiting or disadvantaging each other.

For example, the Neighbourhood Legal Services of Los Angeles County (NLSLA) has an anti-nepotism policy that requires employees to notify HR if a new familial relationship is discovered between employees or vendors. The policy does not forbid relatives from being hired but does prohibit them from supervising each other or influencing hiring, promotion, or other employment decisions.

When crafting an anti-nepotism policy, it is important to define what nepotism means and what relationships are covered. The policy should also specify the job positions covered, such as all employees, supervisors, or executives, and whether it applies to full-time and part-time employees. It should outline any exceptions, such as when there are no other qualified candidates, and set forth the penalties for violating the policy.

It is worth noting that anti-nepotism policies should be carefully considered and may be subject to legal requirements or restrictions. In some states, it is illegal for employers to discriminate against applicants and employees based on marital or family status, so a blanket policy prohibiting any relative of an employee from working for the company may be illegal. Therefore, it is important to consult legal counsel to ensure the policy is compliant with relevant laws and regulations.

Pros and cons of hiring employees' relatives

In the US, a father-in-law would be considered a relative in the context of hiring.

Now, onto the pros and cons of hiring employees' relatives.

Pros

• Access to qualified candidates: Hiring managers may find qualified candidates they might not have otherwise considered. This can help the organisation grow its team of knowledgeable individuals.
• Increased loyalty: Employees may feel more loyal to their employer after the hiring of a family member. This can increase employee retention rates, as both employees will try to support each other's careers.
• Understanding of company culture: Candidates will already be familiar with the company, making it easier for hiring managers to give an impression of the organisation's professional environment and culture.

Cons

• Personal conflicts: When family members work for the same employer, there is a potential for personal conflicts to enter the workplace, negatively impacting employees' ability to focus on their job duties.
• Resentment among other employees: Hiring a relative may lead to resentment and accusations of favouritism from other employees.
• Multiple absences: Family emergencies may lead to multiple employees being absent at the same time, putting a strain on the rest of the team.
• Negative impact on productivity: Hired relatives may take advantage of their position and be less productive, especially if they believe their relationship with other employees will protect them from disciplinary action.
• Legal issues: In some cases, hiring family members may be considered a conflict of interest, particularly in government jobs.

To mitigate these potential issues, companies can implement formal policies regarding the hiring of relatives, including keeping them separated at work and avoiding any appearance of nepotism.

Companies should have a formal policy on hiring relatives

A formal policy on hiring relatives should be included in the employee handbook and should cover several key areas. Firstly, it should define what constitutes a "relative", as this can vary depending on local, state, or federal laws. For example, does it include in-laws, cousins, or domestic partners?

Secondly, the policy should outline guidelines to prevent favoritism or conflicts of interest, especially in supervisory or reporting relationships. This may include restrictions on relatives working in the same department, having one relative manage the other, or being part of a hiring committee for a relative.

Thirdly, the policy should include disciplinary actions for unreported relationships or incidents of favoritism. For example, if a previously unreported relative relationship is discovered between a manager and a team member, one of them may need to be transferred or face disciplinary action.

By having a formal policy in place, companies can minimize misunderstandings, treat all employees fairly, and maintain a professional work environment.

In addition to a formal policy, there are also other steps companies can take to manage the hiring of relatives. One option is to have written job descriptions for every position, including the responsibilities and qualifications required. This can help avoid accusations of nepotism by ensuring that all candidates are evaluated based on the same criteria.

Another approach is to keep relatives separated at work, either by having them work in different departments or simply ensuring they don't have a supervisory relationship. This can reduce the potential for personal conflicts and resentment among other employees.

Finally, companies should avoid even the appearance of nepotism. Even if there is no actual favoritism involved, the perception of it can still impact the workplace culture and lead to resentment or suspicion among employees.

Overall, while hiring relatives can have its benefits, it is important for companies to have a formal policy in place to manage this process effectively and ensure a fair and unbiased workplace.

Companies should define relatives and the scope of relationships covered

When it comes to hiring, companies should clearly define what constitutes a "relative" and outline the specific relationships covered in their policies. This definition is crucial to prevent nepotism, favouritism, and conflicts of interest, thereby ensuring a fair and unbiased workplace.

A relative can be defined as an individual related by blood or marriage. This includes relationships such as parents, step-parents, grandparents, in-laws, spouses, children, step-children, siblings, aunts, uncles, nieces, nephews, and cousins. In-laws, specifically, can refer to the parents, children, and siblings of one's spouse.

However, companies may choose to further specify the degree of relationships covered, such as within the third degree of relation, to manage potential risks effectively. For instance, a company may state that it considers "relatives" to include any person related by blood or marriage within the third degree, encompassing the same categories mentioned above.

Additionally, companies may also include domestic partners and adopted children in their definition of relatives. This comprehensive approach ensures that the policy covers a wide range of relationships and helps maintain a professional and unbiased work environment.

By explicitly defining "relatives" and the scope of relationships covered, companies can promote transparency, fairness, and consistency in their hiring processes, thereby reducing potential conflicts and promoting a positive company culture.

Frequently asked questions