Rebellion Against Injustices: Law's Evolution

When injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty is a quote commonly misattributed to Thomas Jefferson. It captures some of the ideas that Jefferson expressed in the Declaration of Independence, such as the right and duty of the people to throw off a government that is reducing them under absolute Despotism. The quote has been used to inspire a sense of patriotism and has been applied to the fight for equality.

Resistance as a moral responsibility

The phrase "when injustice becomes law, rebellion is law" is often misattributed to Thomas Jefferson. While Jefferson likely did not originate this quote, the sentiment it expresses is aligned with some of his documented beliefs. In his letters, Jefferson expressed his support for rebellion and resistance to government, stating:

> "The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions, that I wish it to be always kept alive... I like a little rebellion now and then. It is like a storm in the atmosphere."

Jefferson, who wrote the Declaration of Independence, also included ideas in this document that echo the concept of resistance as a moral responsibility. In the Declaration, he wrote about the right and duty of the people to "throw off" a government that engages in a "long train of abuses and usurpations" that work towards "absolute Despotism".

The idea that "when injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty" implies that when laws are perceived as unjust, it is not only a right but a moral obligation for citizens to resist and rebel. This notion has been invoked by various social activists throughout history, including members of Australia's Socialist Alliance in 1993, who used this phrase to criticize their government's decision to detain refugee children.

In the context of "when injustice becomes law, rebellion is law," resistance can be seen as a necessary act to correct injustices and uphold moral principles. However, it is important to note that the line between lawful protest and unlawful rebellion is often blurred, and what constitutes "injustice" can be subjective. As such, resistance should be approached with careful consideration of its potential consequences and carried out in a manner that respects the rights and well-being of others.

The right to rebel

The phrase "when injustice becomes law, rebellion is law" is often misattributed to Thomas Jefferson, the author of the Declaration of Independence. While Jefferson did believe in rebellion and wrote about the value of "the spirit of resistance to government", there is no evidence that he used this specific phrase. The first known attribution to Jefferson was in 2006, although the saying had been in circulation for decades prior.

The idea that "when injustice becomes law, rebellion is law" implies that when laws are perceived as unjust, it is the right and duty of the people to rebel against them. This concept is not unique to Jefferson, and has been expressed by other notable figures throughout history. For example, Henry David Thoreau, a 19th-century American author and philosopher, is known for his essay "Civil Disobedience", in which he argued that individuals should not blindly follow the laws of the state if they conflict with their conscience.

However, the right to rebel is not without its complexities and potential pitfalls. For one, who decides what constitutes "injustice"? What may seem like an injustice to one group of people may not be viewed the same way by another group. Additionally, rebellion can take many forms, ranging from peaceful protests to violent uprisings, and the question of how far rebellion can go before it becomes unjust itself is a complex ethical and philosophical issue.

Despite these complexities, the idea that "when injustice becomes law, rebellion is law" continues to resonate with people around the world who are fighting against what they perceive as unjust laws and systems.

Injustices in law

The quote "When injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty" is commonly misattributed to Thomas Jefferson. While the quote itself does not appear in his writings, it captures some of the ideas that Jefferson expressed in the Declaration of Independence. Jefferson, who wrote the Declaration of Independence, did believe in rebellion, and his letters convey that sentiment. In one such letter from 1787, he wrote:

> "The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions, that I wish it to be always kept alive. It will often be exercised when wrong, but better so than not to be exercised at all. I like a little rebellion now and then. It is like a storm in the atmosphere."

The first known attribution of the quote to Jefferson was in 2006, although it has been in circulation for decades. The phrase was likely popularized by social activists in Australia.

While the quote may be misattributed to Jefferson, it highlights an important aspect of law and injustice. When laws are perceived as unjust, it can spark resistance and even rebellion. This dynamic has played out throughout history and continues to be a relevant issue today.

Another example of legal injustice can be seen in the context of civil rights movements. Throughout history, there have been numerous instances where laws have institutionalized discrimination and violated the basic rights of marginalized communities. In such cases, resistance to these unjust laws became a moral imperative for those seeking to bring about change and secure equal rights for all.

In conclusion, the phrase "when injustice becomes law, rebellion becomes duty" underscores the delicate balance between law and justice. When laws are perceived as unjust, resistance can become a form of moral duty. While the quote itself may not be directly linked to Thomas Jefferson, it reflects a sentiment that has resonated throughout history and continues to be relevant in the ongoing struggle for justice and equality.

The duty to overthrow oppressive governments

The phrase "when injustice becomes law, rebellion becomes duty" is commonly misattributed to Thomas Jefferson. While this quote has not been found in his writings, it encapsulates ideas expressed in the Declaration of Independence, which he authored. The quote highlights the notion that when a government engages in a long train of abuses and usurpations, systematically infringing on the rights and freedoms of its citizens, it is the right and duty of the people to rise up and overthrow such an oppressive regime.

Throughout history, there have been numerous instances where people have risen up against oppressive governments. From the American Revolution, led by Thomas Jefferson and his compatriots, to more recent examples such as the Arab Spring, people have recognized their duty to resist tyranny and fight for their freedom. This duty is often driven by a sense of moral responsibility and a belief in a higher power or natural law that transcends man-made laws.

However, the duty to rebel against oppressive governments is not without its complexities. It raises important questions about the nature of law, justice, and the role of citizens in a democratic society. Citizens must carefully consider the implications of their actions and strive to use peaceful means to bring about change whenever possible. The use of violence or force should be a last resort, and even then, it must be done with the understanding that it is a grave step, not to be taken lightly.

Ultimately, the idea that "when injustice becomes law, rebellion becomes duty" serves as a powerful reminder of the responsibilities that come with citizenship. It underscores the importance of staying vigilant and holding those in power accountable to prevent the abuse of law and the erosion of freedom. While overthrowing an oppressive government may sometimes become necessary, it is crucial to approach such actions with careful consideration and a commitment to upholding the rights and dignity of all.

The importance of challenging unjust laws

The phrase "when injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty" is often attributed to Thomas Jefferson, the author of the Declaration of Independence, although there is no evidence that he ever said it. The sentiment, however, is one that has been echoed by many throughout history, and it underscores the importance of challenging unjust laws.

Unjust laws exist everywhere, and they can have a significant impact on people's lives, violating their civil and human rights. For example, laws that permit slavery or prohibit same-sex marriage are considered unjust because they infringe on the rights and freedoms of certain individuals or groups. Challenging these laws is crucial to uphold the principles of equality, freedom, and justice.

There are several ways to challenge unjust laws. One approach is through peaceful protest and civil disobedience, as demonstrated by Martin Luther King Jr. and other civil rights activists during the 1963 civil rights campaign in Birmingham, Alabama. By engaging in non-violent actions, they were able to shine a light on the injustice of segregation laws and catalyze change. Another way to challenge unjust laws is through legal means, such as litigation and lobbying for legislative change. This approach leverages the power of the justice system to uphold the rights of those affected by unjust laws.

Additionally, education and advocacy play a vital role in challenging unjust laws. By raising awareness about the existence and impact of unjust laws, individuals and organizations can build momentum for change. This includes educating oneself and others about the origins and consequences of unjust laws, as well as supporting organizations working towards achieving justice.

In some cases, challenging unjust laws may involve making difficult choices and trade-offs. For example, a business owner may struggle with the decision to comply with a law that goes against their moral or religious beliefs. In such situations, prudence, courage, and common sense are necessary to navigate the complexities of the situation.

Frequently asked questions