Understanding Martial Law: Martian Scenarios And Applications

Martial law is a legal concept that involves the temporary substitution of civilian government by military rule, typically during times of war, rebellion, civil unrest, or natural disaster. It grants military authorities unlimited power to suspend legal protections and civil liberties, such as freedom of speech, movement, and protection from unreasonable searches and seizures. While there is no universal definition of martial law, it is generally considered a last resort when law and order are at risk of collapsing. In the United States, the power to impose martial law rests with the President and Congress at the national level, and with state governors within their respective states. The declaration of martial law is a significant decision that can have far-reaching consequences for the country and its citizens.

Who can declare martial law?

Martial law is a complex and ambiguous concept that has no established definition. It involves the temporary substitution of military authority for civilian rule and is usually invoked in times of war, rebellion, or natural disaster. In the United States, martial law may be declared by the president or a state governor, but a formal proclamation is not necessary. While the U.S. Constitution does not explicitly mention martial law, nearly every state has a constitutional provision authorizing the imposition of martial law.

The power to declare martial law ultimately rests with a nation's top civilian leader, typically the president. However, the circumstances under which it can be declared and the limitations on its scope and duration are governed by legislation or a country's constitution. For example, a president may be authorized to declare martial law during a time of violent civil unrest, but only for a limited period, such as 60 days.

Historically, martial law in the United States has been declared far more frequently by state governors than by the president. Notably, there has never been a country-wide imposition of martial law in the U.S., but there have been numerous instances of martial law being declared in specific local areas.

The Supreme Court has never explicitly stated whether the federal government has the power to declare martial law, and if so, whether it would require congressional authorization. However, it is clear that such a declaration, if made, would have to abide by the U.S. Constitution and is subject to judicial review.

In conclusion, while the power to declare martial law may lie with the president or other top civilian leaders, it is a complex and ambiguous concept that is not explicitly defined or granted in the U.S. Constitution. The declaration of martial law is a rare and momentous decision with significant ramifications, and as such, it is typically a last resort reserved for situations of severe crisis and civil disorder.

What happens when martial law is imposed?

When martial law is imposed, civilian government is replaced by military rule. Military commanders, not elected officials, make and enforce laws, and ordinary citizens accused of defying martial law may face military tribunals instead of civilian courts. Martial law is typically declared in times of war, rebellion, or natural disaster, and is justified when civilian authority has ceased to function, is completely absent, or has become ineffective.

In the United States, martial law has been declared roughly 68 times since the country's founding in 1776. It has been invoked during war, labor disputes, natural disasters, and civil unrest. While the U.S. Constitution does not explicitly mention martial law, and no federal statute or Supreme Court decision clearly states who has the authority to declare it, the power to do so usually rests with the President or a State governor. However, the Posse Comitatus Act forbids U.S. military involvement in domestic law enforcement without congressional approval.

Under martial law, military leaders assume executive, legislative, and judicial powers. They may impose curfews and media blackouts, suspend the writ of habeas corpus, commandeer businesses, prohibit certain sales (like alcohol), control hospitals and emergency facilities, regulate wages and working conditions, and require mandatory fingerprinting and identification of civilians.

Martial law can continue for a specified amount of time or indefinitely, and standard civil liberties may be suspended for as long as it is in place.

What is the history of martial law in the US?

The history of martial law in the US is a complex and nuanced topic, with a range of factors influencing its declaration and enforcement. Here is an overview of the key points:

• Martial law in the US refers to the placement of a region, state, city, or the entire nation under the control of a military body. This can be done by the US President, Congress, or a state governor, and has been imposed at least 68 times, mostly for labour unrest.
• The first instance of martial law was declared by General Andrew Jackson in New Orleans during the War of 1812. This decision was unpopular and led to a judge fining Jackson, who later regained the money through a special law passed by Congress.
• Martial law has also been implemented nationally twice: by Abraham Lincoln during the Civil War and by Franklin Roosevelt during World War II, including the incarceration of Japanese-Americans. Both declarations were deemed partially unconstitutional by the courts.
• The Insurrection Act of 1807 and the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 govern the use of federal forces in domestic law enforcement. The former authorises the President to deploy troops under specific circumstances, while the latter prohibits their involvement without congressional approval.
• Martial law can be total, where the military replaces the legal system, or partial, where it provides varying degrees of assistance. It is often declared during emergencies, such as civil unrest or natural disasters, and can be imposed in stages.
• The US Supreme Court has addressed martial law on a handful of occasions, with inconsistent and vague reasoning. The most recent case, Duncan v. Kahanamoku (1946), analysed the legality of martial law in Hawaii after the Pearl Harbor attack.
• The concept of martial law is tied to habeas corpus, the right to a hearing and trial on lawful imprisonment. Article 1, Section 9 of the US Constitution allows the suspension of habeas corpus in cases of rebellion or invasion.
• The use of martial law is controversial, with Congress and the judicial branch often frowning upon it. It has been described as a departure from American tradition, and its declaration is usually met with backlash and legal challenges.

What is the Posse Comitatus Act?

The Posse Comitatus Act is a United States federal law that limits the powers of the federal government in the use of federal military personnel to enforce domestic policies within the United States. The Act was signed on June 18, 1878, by President Rutherford B. Hayes, and bars federal troops from participating in civilian law enforcement except when expressly authorized by law.

The Act was passed in 1878, after the end of Reconstruction and the return of white supremacists to political power in both southern states and Congress. Through the law, Congress sought to ensure that the federal military would not be used to intervene in the establishment of Jim Crow in the former Confederacy. The broader principle that the military should not be allowed to interfere in the affairs of civilian government is a core American value.

The Posse Comitatus Act operates as an extension of constitutional safeguards, such as the division of power over the military between Congress and the president, and the guarantees of the Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments, which were in part reactions to abuses committed by the British army against American colonists.

The Act originally applied only to the United States Army, but a subsequent amendment in 1956 expanded its scope to the United States Air Force. Further amendments in 2021 expanded the scope of the Act to cover the United States Navy, Marine Corps, and Space Force. The United States Coast Guard is not covered by the Act, primarily because it also has a maritime law enforcement mission.

The Posse Comitatus Act is a criminal statute under which there has apparently never been a prosecution. However, it has been invoked to challenge the jurisdiction of the courts, as a defence in criminal prosecutions for other offences, and as a ground for the suppression of evidence.

How does martial law impact citizens' rights?

Martial law is the temporary substitution of civilian government by military rule. It is usually invoked in times of war, rebellion, civil unrest, or natural disaster. When martial law is in effect, the military commander of an area or country has unlimited authority to make and enforce laws. This means that standard civil liberties may be suspended for as long as martial law continues.

In the United States, martial law may be declared by proclamation of the President or a State governor, but such a formal proclamation is not necessary. Although the U.S. Constitution makes no specific provision for the imposition of martial law, nearly every State has a constitutional provision authorizing the government to impose it. While the federal government is bound at all times by the Constitution, and even under martial law, it cannot suspend or violate constitutional rights, the imposition of martial law does impact citizens' rights in several ways.

Firstly, martial law suspends all existing laws, as well as civil authority and the ordinary administration of justice. Civilians may not be tried by military tribunals as long as civilian courts are functional. However, within the bounds of court decisions, a military commander's authority under martial law is virtually unlimited. This means that citizens may face arrest for violating curfews set by military authorities, or for offenses at military discretion that they would not be detained for under civilian rule.

Secondly, the laws related to habeas corpus, which prevent citizens from being unlawfully detained, may also be suspended. Should such measures be applied, military personnel would be able to detain citizens indefinitely.

Thirdly, citizens' right to free speech, free movement, and freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures can all be suspended under martial law.

Finally, existing laws would no longer apply after a declaration of martial law, meaning citizens could be charged with a crime for an action that would not normally be illegal.

In summary, while martial law does not give the military the power to suspend or violate constitutional rights, it does allow for the suspension of many other rights and liberties ordinarily granted to citizens under civilian rule.

Frequently asked questions