Abortion Laws: Necessary Evils Or Women's Rights?

Abortion laws are a highly debated topic, with people divided into two groups: pro-choice and pro-life. The pro-choice side argues that abortion is a safe medical procedure that protects lives, especially in cases of nonviable pregnancies, and that banning abortions denies bodily autonomy and endangers pregnant individuals. On the other hand, the pro-life side considers abortion as murder, believing that life begins at conception and that abortion creates a culture where life is disposable. Restrictive abortion laws have been linked to enormous harm, including thousands of deaths from unsafe abortions, loss of educational and economic opportunities, and the deepening of historical marginalization. The criminalization of abortion also disproportionately impacts young and poor women, pushing them towards unsafe methods and clandestine markets. The debate around abortion laws centers on balancing the protection of fetal life with the fundamental human rights and bodily autonomy of women.

Criminalisation of abortion violates the fundamental human rights of women and girls

The criminalisation of abortion violates the fundamental human rights of women and girls. Abortion laws should be informed by human rights, and the criminalisation of abortion is a violation of several human rights.

The criminalisation of abortion violates the right to non-discrimination and equality. When abortion is criminalised, it disproportionately affects those who are already marginalised, including people on low incomes, refugees, migrants, LGBTIQ+ people, and racialised and Indigenous people. These groups already face barriers to accessing healthcare, and criminalising abortion further limits their access to safe services.

The criminalisation of abortion also violates the right to privacy and the right to make decisions about one's own body. This is known as bodily autonomy, and it is a fundamental human right. Forcing someone to carry an unwanted pregnancy or to seek an unsafe abortion is a violation of their bodily autonomy and their reproductive autonomy.

In addition, the criminalisation of abortion can constitute a violation of the right to be free from torture or inhumane and degrading treatment. When women and girls are denied access to safe and legal abortion services, they may resort to unsafe and clandestine abortions, which can result in serious health complications and even death. This puts their lives and health at risk and subjects them to substantial pain and suffering, which can be considered a form of torture or cruel, inhumane, and degrading treatment.

Furthermore, the criminalisation of abortion can have negative consequences for the social and economic well-being of women and girls. Denying access to abortion can lead to increased poverty, debt, negative public records, and reliance on government assistance. It can also impact their physical and mental health, their ability to continue their education or participate in the workforce, and their ability to care for their existing children.

The criminalisation of abortion also affects the availability and quality of healthcare services. It can deter healthcare providers from offering the best care options and limit the availability of trained abortion providers. It can also increase bureaucracy within health systems and contribute to negative stereotypes and stigma surrounding abortion, making it more difficult for women and girls to access safe and legal abortion services.

Abortion laws disproportionately impact poor and young women

Women from middle and higher socioeconomic backgrounds have access to adequate and safe healthcare and do not generally experience post-abortion complications. In contrast, less advantaged women, often teenagers, are forced to seek clandestine interventions in precarious sanitary conditions. The high mortality rates for abortion reflect the discrimination faced by women from poor backgrounds.

In a 2005 study, 73% of women undergoing an abortion said they could not afford to have a baby. That number rose to 81% for women below the federal poverty line. While the abortion rate for American women declined by 8% between 2000 and 2008, it increased by 18% among poor American women.

Restrictive abortion laws can cause distress and stigma and may violate the human rights of women and girls, including the right to privacy, the right to non-discrimination and equality, and the right to bodily autonomy. Such regulations impose financial burdens on women, especially those with low resources, who may be forced to travel to obtain legal care or incur other expenses such as mandatory counselling or waiting periods.

Abortion laws also impact young women, who are increasingly making their voices heard on this issue. A KFF survey found that abortion is the most important issue for women under 30 in the November election, with nearly four in ten naming it as their top priority. This represents a significant shift since the spring, indicating that young women are becoming more engaged in the abortion rights debate.

Restrictive abortion laws cause enormous harm

Firstly, restrictive abortion laws endanger the lives and health of pregnant people. According to the World Health Organization, 23,000 women die from unsafe abortions each year, and tens of thousands more experience significant health complications. Unsafe abortions can lead to physical and mental health issues, including maternal death, infertility, and long-term health problems. Restrictive laws also prevent people from seeking post-abortion care for fear of prosecution and punishment, further endangering their health.

Secondly, such laws violate people's fundamental human rights to bodily autonomy, privacy, equality, and non-discrimination. They deny individuals the right to make decisions about their bodies, their future, and their reproductive lives. This is especially harmful to women and girls, as it reinforces gender inequalities and stigmatizes them for their reproductive choices.

Thirdly, restrictive abortion laws disproportionately impact marginalized communities, including people of color, those from low-income backgrounds, refugees, migrants, LGBTQI+ individuals, and racialized and Indigenous people. These communities often face greater barriers in accessing safe and legal abortions, forcing them to resort to unsafe and clandestine abortions, which can have fatal consequences.

Lastly, restrictive laws create barriers to accessing abortion services, such as financial constraints, travel requirements, and social stigma. People may be unable to afford the costs associated with abortions or travel to another state or country to receive care. The stigma surrounding abortion, often perpetuated by anti-abortion activists, further discourages people from seeking abortions and contributes to negative mental health outcomes.

The harm caused by restrictive abortion laws is extensive and far-reaching. It endangers lives, violates human rights, exacerbates inequalities, and creates barriers to accessing essential healthcare services.

Abortion bans endanger healthcare for those not seeking abortions

Abortion laws have been a topic of debate for a long time, with people divided into two groups: pro-choice and pro-life. While proponents of legal abortion believe that it is a safe medical procedure that protects lives, opponents believe that it is murder as life begins at conception. The debate surrounding abortion laws is centred around the question of whether abortion should be a legal option.

Abortion bans have been shown to endanger healthcare for those not seeking abortions. Medical treatment for nonviable pregnancies, such as ectopic pregnancies, is often the same as an abortion. Ectopic pregnancies occur when a fertilized egg implants somewhere other than the uterine cavity, and they account for about 1 in 50 pregnancies, with bleeding from ectopic pregnancies causing 10% of all pregnancy-related deaths. In the case of ectopic and other nonviable pregnancies, the treatment is often identical to that for an abortion. While some abortion bans include exceptions for nonviable pregnancies and miscarriages, others are too vague to be practical, leading to healthcare providers refusing to perform procedures that could be interpreted as "on-demand" abortions out of fear of liability or prosecution.

Additionally, abortion bans can create a slippery slope towards restricting access to contraception and other healthcare services. For instance, some pharmacists have refused to fill prescriptions for miscarriages and ectopic pregnancies as the drugs can also be used for abortions. Bans on abortions can also negatively impact the availability of emergency medical care for pregnant individuals, as hospitals may be required to provide stabilizing treatment but are restricted by state abortion laws.

The impact of abortion bans on healthcare access is further exacerbated by the lack of clear and uniform exceptions across different bans. In many states, multiple abortion bans exist, and the exception provisions in these bans often contradict each other, creating confusion for both patients and healthcare providers. This ambiguity can lead to delays in care and avoidable risks to the health of pregnant individuals.

Furthermore, abortion bans can deter physicians from practicing in states with restrictive abortion laws, exacerbating existing disparities in access to obstetric care and adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. Physicians in states with abortion bans must navigate the complex legal landscape, risking prosecution, prison time, monetary fines, and loss of their professional licenses if they are found to violate the bans. This has led to some physicians leaving states with abortion restrictions or even the field of obstetrics and gynaecology altogether.

The consequences of abortion bans extend beyond those seeking abortions, endangering the healthcare of individuals with nonviable pregnancies, creating confusion and delays in emergency medical care, and deterring physicians from practicing in certain states. These impacts highlight the complex nature of abortion laws and their far-reaching consequences on healthcare access and provision.

Abortion is a safe medical procedure that protects lives

The safety of abortion procedures is further evidenced by the fact that the "abortion pill", Mifeprex, has a better safety record than common over-the-counter drugs such as Tylenol, as well as prescription medications like penicillin and Viagra. Medication abortion, a combination of Mifeprex and Misoprostol, has a mortality rate of 6.5 deaths per one million patients.

In addition to being a safe procedure, abortion also protects lives by providing a way to end a pregnancy that may pose risks to the pregnant person's health or life. For example, ectopic pregnancies, where a fertilized egg implants outside the uterine cavity, are non-viable and can cause dangerous bleeding. The treatment for ectopic pregnancies is often the same as for an abortion. By having access to safe and legal abortion, people can avoid the risks associated with unsafe abortions, which are the third leading cause of preventable maternal deaths worldwide, according to the World Health Organization.

Furthermore, abortion laws that restrict or criminalize the procedure can lead to unsafe abortions, particularly in developing countries. Globally, 45% of abortions are unsafe, and 97% of these take place in developing countries. Restrictive abortion laws do not reduce the number of abortions but instead lead to more unsafe abortions. The World Health Organization states that "evidence shows that restricting access to abortions does not reduce the number of abortions; however, it does affect whether the abortions that women and girls attain are safe and dignified."

The criminalization of abortion can also lead to negative health outcomes and increased mortality for those who are forced to resort to unsafe methods. It can also disproportionately impact young and poor women, who may not have access to safe and legal abortion services.

In conclusion, abortion is a safe medical procedure that can protect the lives and health of pregnant people, especially when it is legal and accessible. Restrictive abortion laws endanger the lives and well-being of those who are unable to obtain safe and legal abortions, contributing to preventable maternal deaths and health complications.

Frequently asked questions