Moore's Law And Renewable Energy: Diverging Paths

Moore's Law states that computing power will double every 18 to 24 months. This has been leveraged by the renewable energy sector to drive innovation and improve efficiency. However, Moore's Law does not apply to renewable energy in the same way due to fundamental differences in the underlying technologies and the challenges of storing physical energy. While computing power has increased exponentially, the progress in renewable energy technologies has been more linear and gradual. The cost of renewable energy has declined significantly over time, but the pace of change is slower compared to the digital computer revolution.

Moore's Law is a consequence of fundamental physics, whereas clean technology cost declines are not

Moore's Law, framed by Intel co-founder Gordon Moore, is a fundamental principle that guides the course of modern computing and the semiconductor industry. The law is based on Moore's prediction that the number of transistors on a computer chip would double every two years.

Moore's Law is a consequence of fundamental physics. When Moore made his prediction in 1965, he based it on the physics of transistors. As transistors get smaller, they become faster, lighter, and more efficient, consuming less power. This results in improved performance and a reduction in the cost of manufacturing, as the cost of producing the same chip area remains roughly the same.

On the other hand, clean technology cost declines are not driven by fundamental physics in the same way. For example, the cost of silicon solar panels has decreased due to factors such as lower input material costs from scale, reduced labour costs through manufacturing automation, and lower waste from efficient processing. These cost reductions are a result of manufacturing scale and vertical integration rather than improvements in the underlying physics of the technology.

While Moore's Law has driven exponential growth in computing power and complexity, clean technologies have not seen similar performance improvements. The laws and limits of physics constrain the efficiency of renewable energy technologies such as solar panels, wind turbines, and batteries. For instance, solar panels can only convert a certain percentage of photons from the sun, and wind turbines can only capture a limited amount of kinetic energy from the air.

In summary, Moore's Law in computing is underpinned by fundamental physics, whereas clean technology cost declines are driven by manufacturing scale, automation, and efficiency gains that are not dependent on the same physical principles.

Moore's Law is a prediction about innovation as a function of time, whereas clean technology cost declines are a function of experience or production

Moore's Law, which states that computing power will double every 18 to 24 months, has been used as a metric for technological innovation. However, it is important to recognise that Moore's Law is specific to the field of computer processors and may not be applicable to other sectors, such as renewable energy.

Moore's Law is a prediction about innovation as a function of time. It is based on the physics of transistors, where shrinking the transistor size improves its performance and reduces the cost per unit of computing power. In contrast, clean technology cost declines in renewable energy technologies, such as solar panels and batteries, are driven by factors such as lower input material costs, manufacturing automation, and efficient processing. These cost reductions are a function of experience or production, rather than fundamental physics.

The advances in clean technology are driven by experience and scale, following the "learning by doing" principle. This is different from Moore's Law, which is based on a specific, quantitative prediction about the doubling of transistor density. The cost reductions in renewable energy technologies are not necessarily accompanied by significant performance enhancements. For example, the power output of silicon solar panels has only doubled in the last 50 years, while the computing power of microchips has increased by a factor of over a billion during the same period.

The cost of renewable energy technologies has declined due to manufacturing scale and vertical integration. For instance, the cost of silicon solar panels has decreased due to lower input material costs, reduced labour costs through automation, and minimised waste through efficient processing. These cost reductions are not driven by fundamental physics, as in the case of Moore's Law, but rather by improvements in manufacturing processes and supply chain optimisation.

While Moore's Law provided a basis for dramatic performance improvements in microchips, leading to the digital revolution, clean technology cost declines do not imply a similar revolution in energy. The energy density of batteries, for example, has only doubled over the last decade, indicating that cost reductions in renewable energy technologies do not always lead to significant performance improvements.

In summary, Moore's Law is a prediction about innovation in computer processors as a function of time, based on the physics of transistors. On the other hand, clean technology cost declines in renewable energy technologies are driven by factors such as experience, production, and supply chain optimisation. These cost reductions do not necessarily lead to revolutionary performance improvements, as seen in the case of microchips following Moore's Law.

Moore's Law provided a basis to expect dramatic performance improvements, whereas clean technology cost declines do not imply a similar revolution in energy

Moore's Law states that computing power will double every 18 to 24 months. This has been validated over several decades and has been a self-fulfilling prophecy, with the financial markets and the computing ecosystem knowing what to expect.

However, Moore's Law does not apply to clean energy technologies. Over the last 50 years, while the computing power of an identically-sized microchip has increased by a factor of over a billion, the power output of an identically-sized silicon solar panel has merely doubled. This is because Moore's Law is a consequence of fundamental physics, whereas clean technology cost declines are not. Moore's prediction was based on the physics of transistors, and the fact that as transistors shrank, they became smaller, lighter, faster, and more reliable.

Clean technology cost declines, on the other hand, are driven by manufacturing scale and vertical integration, rather than performance improvements. For example, falling costs of silicon solar panels have been driven by lower input material costs from scale, lower labor costs through manufacturing automation, and lower waste driven by efficient processing.

Renewable energy can take advantage of the huge increase in computing power, along with artificial intelligence, robotic deployment, and automation. However, these technologies are not enough to replace fossil fuels without also improving energy storage.

Miniaturization increases the power of integrated circuits and reduces the cost of computational devices, but miniaturizing renewables would make them ineffective

Moore's Law states that the number of transistors on an integrated circuit will double about every two years. This prediction, made by Intel co-founder Gordon Moore in 1965, has guided long-term planning and research in the semiconductor industry. The law is driven by companies actively working to uphold it through coordinated advances in tools, processes, software, and testing.

Miniaturization, a key aspect of Moore's Law, has been the central driver of innovation in the electronics industry. By shrinking components to the micrometer and nanometer scales, engineers can pack more performance into less space. This results in smaller, faster, and cheaper electronic products, such as mobile phones, computers, and vehicle engines. In the case of integrated circuits, miniaturization leads to higher transistor density, faster performance, and lower power consumption.

However, the principle of miniaturization does not apply in the same way to renewable energy technologies, such as solar panels and batteries. While miniaturization in electronics can lead to improved performance and reduced costs, miniaturizing renewable energy technologies can make them ineffective. This is because the cost and performance improvements in renewable energy technologies are not primarily driven by fundamental physics or miniaturization, but rather by manufacturing scale, vertical integration, and learning by doing.

For example, the cost of silicon solar panels has decreased due to lower input material costs, lower labor costs through manufacturing automation, and reduced waste from efficient processing. These cost reductions are not a result of miniaturization but of economies of scale and process optimizations. Additionally, solar panels and batteries have not undergone significant performance enhancements or disruptive technology advances comparable to those in the electronics industry. While the energy density of lithium-ion batteries has doubled over the last decade, gains are expected to slow as the technology reaches its limit.

Therefore, while miniaturization increases the power of integrated circuits and reduces the cost of computational devices, the same cannot be said for renewable energy technologies. The dynamics of innovation and cost reduction in these sectors differ significantly, and miniaturization is not a driving factor for performance improvements in renewables as it is in electronics.

Moore's Law is driven by the inherent qualities of computer circuitry, whereas renewable energy is driven by diverse factors such as policy, regulation, and economic trends

Moore's Law is an observation, not a law of physics, that the number of transistors on a computer chip will double approximately every two years. This prediction was made by Gordon Moore, co-founder of Intel, in 1965, and it has held true for over 50 years. The law is driven by the inherent qualities of computer circuitry, such as the exponential growth in transistor density, which in turn increases the speed and reduces the cost of computing.

On the other hand, renewable energy is driven by a variety of external factors that are largely unrelated to the inherent qualities of the technology itself. These include policy, regulation, and economic trends. For example, energy policy and regulation are critical to implementing renewable energy and governing natural resources. Policies, legislation, and institutional structures established by governments play a significant role in driving investment and innovation in the renewable energy sector.

Economic trends, such as cost declines, are also important drivers of renewable energy. Unlike Moore's Law, which is based on fundamental physics, cost declines in renewable energy are driven by factors such as lower input material costs, lower labour costs, and lower waste through efficient processing. These cost reductions are achieved through manufacturing scale and vertical integration rather than performance improvements.

Additionally, renewable energy is influenced by social trends and public demand for clean energy. For instance, an increasing number of corporations are joining initiatives to procure electricity entirely from renewable sources, and public utilities are investing in renewables to meet the growing demand for clean energy.

While Moore's Law sets a specific, quantitative prediction for the computer chip industry to follow, the advancement of renewable energy is driven by a complex interplay of diverse factors that are constantly evolving and subject to change.

Frequently asked questions