Law Clerks: Independent Contractors Or Employees?

Lawyers, doctors, and other professionals are often hired as independent contractors for specific tasks, but the distinction between an independent contractor and an employee is not always clear. This differentiation is crucial because it determines the benefits and costs for both the worker and the employer. In the case of law clerks, the U.S. Tax Court has ruled that they are employees for employment tax purposes. However, this may not always be the case, as the classification depends on various factors and the specific circumstances of each situation.

Law clerks and independent contractor classification

The classification of law clerks as employees or independent contractors is a complex issue that has been the subject of litigation and debate. The determination of whether an individual is an employee or an independent contractor depends on various factors and the specific facts of each case.

In the United States, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and courts consider several factors when determining the classification of workers, including law clerks. One key factor is the degree of control exerted by the employer over the worker. If the employer has the right to control or direct the manner and means of the work, the worker is typically considered an employee. On the other hand, if the employer only controls the result of the work and not the means and methods, the worker may be classified as an independent contractor.

Case law provides some insight into the classification of law clerks. In the case of Donald G. Cave v. Commissioner, the U.S. Tax Court held that an incorporated law firm's sole shareholder, associate attorneys, and law clerk were employees. The court found that the firm exerted control over the workers by collecting all fees and splitting a portion with the attorneys. Additionally, the firm failed to issue the required Forms 1099 and did not have a reasonable basis for treating the workers as independent contractors. This case illustrates that even if a firm claims its workers are independent contractors, the degree of control and other factors may lead to a determination of employee status.

The ABC test, adopted by the Supreme Court of California and several other states, provides a framework for determining worker classification. Under this test, a worker is presumed to be an employee unless the hiring entity can satisfy all three of the following conditions: the worker is free from the control and direction of the hirer in performing the work; the worker performs work outside the usual course of the hiring entity's business; and the worker is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, or business. This test provides a clearer standard for determining worker classification, but it may still depend on the specific facts and circumstances of each case.

In summary, the classification of law clerks as employees or independent contractors depends on various factors, including the degree of control exerted by the employer, the worker's opportunity for profit or loss, the permanence of the relationship, and the worker's investment in facilities. Each case must be evaluated individually, considering the totality of the circumstances, to determine the appropriate classification. The potential consequences of misclassification can be significant, including tax liabilities and penalties, as well as access to employment benefits and protections.

Benefits of independent contractor status

Whether a law clerk can be an independent contractor depends on the facts of each case. The general rule is that an individual is an independent contractor if the person for whom the services are performed has control over only the result of the work and not what will be done and how it will be done.

• Flexibility and freedom: Independent contractors often enjoy greater freedom and flexibility in their work, such as the ability to choose projects and work for themselves. This autonomy can be a significant advantage for those who value independence and the ability to direct their own work.
• Tax advantages: Independent contractors are typically self-employed and pay self-employment taxes, including Social Security and Medicare contributions. They generally do not have taxes withheld from their payments, and they may have access to alternative retirement plans like a SEP IRA, SIMPLE IRA, or solo 401(k). However, it is important to note that they do not have access to unemployment insurance or workers' compensation benefits.
• Reduced liability: Independent contractors are not subject to the same agency liability as employees. They are generally not covered by federal and state discrimination laws, and there are no fringe benefits, pension plans, or retirement plans associated with their status. This can reduce potential liabilities for both the contractor and the hiring entity.
• Efficiency and cost-effectiveness: Independent contractors can be engaged for specific projects or tasks, providing specialized skills or expertise without the long-term commitment of a full-time employee. This flexibility can lead to cost savings and increased efficiency for businesses.
• Potential for higher earnings: Independent contractors can set their rates and negotiate their fees, which can lead to higher earnings compared to traditional employment. They may also have more opportunities to take on multiple clients or projects simultaneously, further increasing their income potential.
• Autonomy in decision-making: Independent contractors typically have more autonomy in decision-making, as they are not bound by the same level of control and direction as employees. They can determine their work methods, schedules, and processes, allowing for greater creativity and ownership over their work.

Worker status disputes

The IRS is currently conducting an intensive employment tax research study of 6,000 taxpayers to investigate tax compliance issues related to independent contractor classification. This means that many lawyers and their clients may find themselves under examination.

In the US, the ABC test is used to determine whether a worker is an employee or an independent contractor. The ABC test assumes that all workers are employees, and it is up to the hiring entity to prove that the worker is an independent contractor. The three conditions that must be met for a worker to be considered an independent contractor are:

• The worker must be free from the control and direction of the hiring entity in connection with the performance of the work.
• The worker must perform work that is outside the usual course of the hiring entity's business.
• The worker must be customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, or business of the same nature as the work performed.

In the case of Donald G. Cave v. Commissioner, the U.S. Tax Court held that an incorporated law firm's sole shareholder, his associate attorneys, and law clerk were all employees. The law firm treated everyone as independent contractors, claiming it didn't control how they did their jobs. However, the IRS disagreed, stating that the firm collected all fees and then split a portion of the fees with the attorneys who handled the cases. This case illustrates the importance of having clear and well-drafted independent contractor agreements in place.

In summary, worker status disputes can be complex and fact-specific. The consequences of misclassification can be significant, including financial penalties and increased costs for businesses. It is important for both businesses and workers to understand the applicable laws and criteria for determining worker status to ensure compliance and protect their rights.

The ABC test

The classification of workers as independent contractors or employees is a complex issue that carries significant financial and legal implications. Misclassification can result in penalties and financial hardship for businesses, while depriving workers of critical rights and protections. To address this problem, several states in the US have adopted the ABC test, a robust, pro-employee test that establishes a presumption of employee status.

• (A) Control: The work is performed free from the direction and control of the employer regarding how the work is done. This factor considers the degree of control exerted by the employer, with independent contractors typically having greater autonomy over their work.
• (B) Scope of Work: The work is performed outside the usual course of the employer's business. This means that the work done by the independent contractor is distinct from the employer's primary business operations.
• (C) Independent Business or Trade: The worker is engaged in an independent business or trade that is similar to the work performed for the employer. In other words, the worker has their own enterprise and is not solely dependent on the employer for work.

While the ABC test is not universally applied across the US, it is in effect in states like California, Massachusetts, and New Jersey, and more than 20 states apply it in some form. The test is particularly relevant in industries where misclassification is prevalent, such as janitorial services, trucking, retail, and construction.

Common law classification rules

The classification of a worker as an employee or an independent contractor has significant implications for both the worker and the employer. The determination of this status is a complex issue that is dependent on the facts and circumstances of each case.

One of the core factors in the 2021 IC Rule is the "nature and degree of control over the work". This factor considers the degree to which the worker can earn profits or suffer losses through their independent efforts and decision-making. Relevant facts include whether the worker negotiates their pay, decides to accept or decline work, hires their own workers, purchases equipment, or engages in marketing and advertising. If the worker has the freedom to take such actions, it indicates that they are an independent contractor. Conversely, if the worker requires approval from the employer, it suggests employee status.

Other factors that may be considered include the worker's opportunity for profit or loss, investment in facilities, and the permanence of the relationship. Additionally, the IRS examines various data sources, including Forms 1099 and W-2, to determine audit strategies and compliance characteristics.

It is important to note that the determination of worker status is not based on a single factor but on the consideration of all relevant factors. The consequences of misclassification can be significant, leading to penalties and financial hardships for businesses and the denial of protections and benefits for workers.

Frequently asked questions