Trump's Martial Law: Could He?

While the US Constitution does not explicitly grant the president the power to declare martial law, scholars argue that the Constitution's enumerated war powers of the legislative and executive branches give both Congress and the president the authority to declare it. In the past, Donald Trump's talk of martial law has put the military on red alert, with ranking officers discussing how the military would respond to chaos around the inauguration and transition. Trump himself has stated that one of his biggest mistakes in 2020 was not declaring martial law, and some of his supporters have publicly broached the subject.

Donald Trump did not declare martial law via tweet

There was no tweet from Donald Trump declaring martial law. A fabricated screenshot of a tweet from an account allegedly belonging to the former president was circulated on social media. The tweet read: "Under the Insurrection Act, I have declared Martial Law. This was an attempted coup. Arrests are being carried out all over the nation. Biden has surrendered his passport. More to come!" While some social media users acknowledged the tweet as fake, others believed it was authentic.

Trump had previously threatened to "deploy the United States military" in response to the George Floyd protests. He vowed that if violence and looting continued, and mayors and governors did not take action, he would "quickly solve the problem". This was interpreted by some as a threat to implement martial law.

Trump's refusal to accept his election defeat to Biden, coupled with his claims of electoral fraud, also led to speculation that he would impose martial law to "rerun" the election. This speculation was fuelled by comments made by former national security adviser Michael Flynn, who suggested that Trump could use the Insurrection Act to deploy the military and "rerun" elections in certain states. However, Trump dismissed these reports as "fake news".

Despite the urgings of some Republicans, such as Marjorie Taylor Greene and Ralph Norman, Trump did not declare martial law. The idea of invoking martial law was met with widespread criticism, with the deputy press secretary, Andrew Bates, calling it a "disgusting affront to our deepest principles as a country".

Martial law can be declared when civil liberties are suspended

Martial law is a legal term used to describe when military authorities take control of civil governance and law enforcement. During this time, executive or military leaders may suspend certain civil liberties and constitutional rights. The purpose of declaring martial law is to create order and control the population to achieve a higher goal, and it is intended to be reserved for times of extreme emergencies when existing civilian governments and law enforcement have ceased to function or become ineffective.

In the United States, the concept of martial law is closely tied to the right of habeas corpus, which is the right to a hearing on lawful imprisonment or the supervision of law enforcement by the judiciary. The ability to suspend habeas corpus is related to the imposition of martial law. While the U.S. Constitution does not explicitly define when a president can declare martial law, it also does not specifically forbid it. There is no constitutional procedure for suspending the First Amendment's protection of free expression, the Fourth Amendment's prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures, the Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights to a trial by jury and the assistance of a lawyer, or the Fifth Amendment right not to "be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." However, the U.S. Supreme Court has held that when civilian courts are in operation, the military cannot substitute military tribunals for civilians accused of non-war crimes.

In the context of the question, "Can Donald Trump call martial law?", it is important to note that there were rumours and fabricated social media posts claiming that former President Donald Trump had declared martial law or was considering doing so. However, Trump himself dismissed these reports as "fake news". While Trump did not officially declare martial law, the matter highlights the potential for martial law to be misused as a political tool to control the population, especially political dissenters.

In conclusion, martial law can be declared when civil liberties are suspended, but this is a rare occurrence in the United States due to its potential for abuse. The suspension of civil liberties during martial law must still abide by the U.S. Constitution and is subject to review in federal court.

The Insurrection Act is not the same as martial law

In the lead-up to Joe Biden's inauguration on January 20, 2021, there were widespread rumors on social media that Donald Trump would impose martial law or invoke the Insurrection Act to prevent the inauguration. However, these rumors were misleading and inaccurate.

The Insurrection Act is a federal law that empowers the president to deploy the military and federalize National Guard troops to suppress certain situations, including civil disorder, insurrection, or rebellion. The Act has been invoked numerous times throughout American history, including by Presidents George Washington, John Adams, Abraham Lincoln, Ulysses Grant, Andrew Jackson, Rutherford Hayes, and Grover Cleveland.

On the other hand, martial law does not have a legal definition in the US. In its most extreme form, it reflects the suspension of civil authority and military control of civilian functions such as the courts. While there were reports that Trump "asked" about the possibility of imposing martial law to rerun the election, there is no indication that he ever seriously considered or planned to impose it.

The Insurrection Act and martial law are two distinct concepts. The Insurrection Act generally permits the military to assist civilian authorities, not take their place. It is a temporary suspension of the Posse Comitatus Act, which forbids the US military from taking part in civilian law enforcement. In contrast, martial law reflects the complete takeover of civilian government functions by the military, which is not authorized by the Insurrection Act.

While the Insurrection Act has been criticized as being dangerously vague and in need of reform, it is not the same as martial law, and there is no evidence that Trump ever invoked the Act or imposed martial law during his presidency.

The US federal government has rarely declared martial law

The power to declare martial law is ambiguous. The Constitution Annotated notes two competing theories regarding the source of this power. The first theory suggests that martial law arises from the government's right, power, and/or duty to "maintain public order" and keep the peace. The second theory proposes that the power to declare martial law comes from the enumerated war powers of the legislative and executive branches, granting both Congress and the president the authority to do so.

Despite the ambiguity, the Constitution gives Congress the authority to regulate the domestic deployment of the military, and Congress has enacted comprehensive legislation in this area. This legislation does not include authorization for the president to impose martial law, indicating that the president may not have the unilateral power to do so. Even if Congress were to provide authorization, the Supreme Court has not conclusively decided that the federal government is constitutionally empowered to declare martial law.

Throughout American history, the federal and state governments have declared martial law over 60 times. Notable instances include General Andrew Jackson's imposition of martial law in New Orleans during the War of 1812, and the declaration of martial law in Nauvoo, Illinois, by Smith, which led to the Illinois Mormon War. More recently, there were rumors of former President Donald Trump considering martial law, but these were proven to be false.

Martial law is not clearly defined

The concept of martial law is not clearly defined, and the law surrounding it is complicated and unsettled. In the United States, martial law usually refers to the power that, in an emergency, allows the military to take the place of the civilian government and exercise jurisdiction over civilians in a particular area. However, the term "martial law" has been used by different people to describe a wide range of actions, practices, and roles for the military. The Supreme Court has never explicitly stated whether the federal government has the power to declare martial law, and if the president could unilaterally declare it or if congressional authorization would be required.

While there are no federal statutes that explicitly authorize the president to declare martial law, Congress has passed numerous laws related to domestic military deployment that grant the president significant authority to use troops domestically in ways that fall short of martial law. The Insurrection Act and potentially Title 32 allow the president to deploy the military to assist civilian authorities with law enforcement activities almost whenever and wherever the president chooses. However, the Posse Comitatus Act prohibits federal military forces from engaging in civilian law enforcement activities without express congressional approval.

The ambiguities in the laws and the breadth of the president's statutory authority underscore the need for Congress to pass legislation that clearly defines the scope and limits of presidential powers, both for martial law and other domestic uses of the military. The lack of a clear definition of martial law and the complex legal landscape surrounding it highlight the importance of a comprehensive understanding of the concept and its implications.

In the context of Donald Trump, there were reports of a fabricated tweet claiming that he had invoked martial law under the Insurrection Act. Additionally, it was reported that Trump had inquired about the possibility of imposing martial law to "rerun" the election, which he denied as "fake news." Furthermore, Republican Ralph Norman urged Trump to declare martial law, which he later regretted due to a misspelling. These incidents demonstrate the controversial nature of the topic and the potential consequences of invoking martial law.

Frequently asked questions