Case Law: Can It Be Revoked?

Case law is an important aspect of the legal system, guiding future decisions based on past rulings. However, the question arises: can case law be revoked? In the US, case law interpretations can be revoked by new statutory law. For example, in the matter of the Fourth Amendment, case law is divided on whether law enforcement can search company-owned devices, but the majority rule is that employees have no legitimate expectation of privacy. However, in Oregon, Judge Ann Aiken ruled that sneak-and-peek warrants, which allow law enforcement to delay notifying a property owner of a warrant, are unconstitutional. This demonstrates that while case law can be influential, it is not immutable and can be revoked or modified by new legal interpretations or statutes.

Case law is revoked by new statutory law

Case law is a law that is based on precedents set by past judicial decisions, rather than law based on constitutions, statutes, or regulations. It is also known as common law. Case law interpretations are considered law unless they are revoked by new statutory law.

When a new case arises, courts must assess how the new statutory language has changed the legal landscape. This can lead to a situation where a court overrules a previous case law by setting a new precedent of higher authority. For example, a lower court may not rule against a binding precedent but can express the hope that a higher court or legislature will reform the rule. The higher court may then review the precedent and the case under appeal, potentially overruling the previous case law.

In some instances, a court may decide on a new analysis that differs from that of junior courts, and may not be bound by its own previous decisions. This new analysis may then be applied to all pending disputes, including those that pre-date the new opinion. However, in some cases, the superseded judicial standard will still govern the resolution of a dispute arising from events that pre-date the new statutory amendment.

While case law can be revoked by new statutory law, it is important to note that even when Congress enacts overrides, courts may continue to follow the prior judicial precedent. This may be due to information failure rather than willful disregard of the new law.

Citizens in a democracy can permit authorities to make and enforce rules

In a democracy, citizens are part of a self-governing community, and they are the ultimate source of authority. This means that citizens in a democracy can permit authorities to make and enforce rules. This is a key feature of a constitutional democracy, where the authority of the majority is limited by legal and institutional means, so that the rights of individuals and minorities are respected.

Citizens in a democracy have the right and opportunity to participate in the political system, and they should be informed and effective participants who understand and are committed to the fundamental principles and values of the democracy. This includes the idea that citizens should act in accordance with the principles of constitutional democracy and work towards narrowing the gap between democratic ideals and reality.

Procedural justice is an important aspect of a constitutional democracy, where fair procedures are used in the gathering of information and decision-making by government agencies and courts. Equality is also a key principle, where all citizens are equally entitled to participate in the political system, and the law does not discriminate on the basis of gender, age, race, ethnicity, religious or political beliefs, class, or economic status.

In a democracy, citizens can permit authorities to make and enforce rules that describe what behavior is permitted and encouraged in their community. These rules can provide order, serve as an alternative to altercation, facilitate a sense that change is possible, encourage social justice, guarantee personal freedoms, and serve as a moral guide.

The Fourth Amendment: warrantless searches and seizures

Case law can be revoked by new statutory law. In the context of the Fourth Amendment, case law has been used to clarify the situations in which a warrantless search is legal, what constitutes a search, and what happens if the government conducts an illegal search and seizure.

The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, prohibiting the United States government from searching a person or their property without a warrant or probable cause. This also applies to arrests and the collection of evidence.

There are, however, exceptions to the warrant requirement. A warrantless search may be lawful if an officer has consent to search, if the search is incident to a lawful arrest, if there is probable cause, and if there are exigent circumstances. Exigent circumstances include situations where people are in imminent danger, evidence faces imminent destruction, or a suspect is about to escape. Additionally, the warrantless search and seizure of properties in plain view, or of abandoned or open-field properties, do not violate the Fourth Amendment as there is no reasonable expectation of privacy in these cases.

The Fourth Amendment also applies to the search and seizure of electronic devices, including company-owned computers and cell phones. In the 2010 case of City of Ontario v. Quon, the Supreme Court held that employees do not have a legitimate expectation of privacy regarding information stored on company-owned devices. Similarly, in the case of Riley v. California, the Supreme Court ruled that the warrantless search of a cell phone's digital contents during an arrest is unconstitutional, as cell phones contain vast amounts of personal data.

The Fourth Amendment's applicability in electronic searches and seizures has received much attention due to the increasing amount of crime occurring electronically. The courts have had to adapt traditional Fourth Amendment principles to the digital age, considering the privacy implications of modern technology.

The legislative process: from proposal to statute

Case law interpretations are law unless they are revoked later by new statutory law. A proposal cannot become a law without consideration and approval by both Houses of Congress.

The legislative process is a matter about which every person should be well informed to understand and appreciate the work of Congress. The process is one of the foundations of the American democratic way of life, with its emphasis on the protection of the minority, allowing ample opportunity for all sides to be heard and make their views known.

The idea for a bill can come from a sitting member of the U.S. Senate or House of Representatives or be proposed during their election campaign. Bills can also be petitioned by people or citizen groups who recommend a new or amended law to a member of Congress that represents them. The right to petition is guaranteed by the First Amendment to the Constitution.

Once a bill is introduced, it is assigned to a committee whose members will research, discuss, and make changes to the bill. The bill is then put before that chamber to be voted on. If the bill passes one body of Congress, it goes to the other body to go through a similar process of research, discussion, changes, and voting. Once both bodies vote to accept a bill, they must work out any differences between the two versions. The preparation of a copy of the bill in the form in which it has passed the House can be a detailed and complicated process due to the large number and complexity of amendments to some bills adopted by the House. Amendments may be offered during a spirited debate with little or no prior formal preparation.

Congress plays a role in presidential elections. Both Houses meet in joint session on the sixth day of January following a presidential election, unless by law they appoint a different day, to count the electoral votes. If no candidate receives a majority of the total electoral votes, the House of Representatives, each state delegation having one vote, chooses the President from among the three candidates having the largest number of electoral votes. The Senate, each Senator having one vote, chooses the Vice President from the two candidates having the largest number of votes for that office.

The role of Congress in the legislative process

Case law can be revoked by new statutory law.

The legislative process is a matter that every person should be well informed about to understand and appreciate the work of Congress. Congress is the lawmaking branch of the federal government. The chief function of Congress is the making of laws. The legislative process is one of the foundations of the American democratic way of life, with its emphasis on the protection of the minority, allowing all sides to be heard and make their views known.

Congress consists of a Senate and a House of Representatives. The Senate is composed of 100 members, two from each state, elected by the people. The House of Representatives can initiate tax and revenue-related legislation, while the Senate can draft legislation related to presidential nominations and treaties. The two chambers are equal in their legislative roles and functions, and the enactment of law requires both chambers to separately agree to the same bill before presenting it to the President.

The legislative process begins with a bill, which is a proposal for a new law or a change to an existing law. The idea for a bill can come from a sitting member of the Senate or House of Representatives, be proposed during their election campaign, or be petitioned by citizens or groups who recommend a new or amended law to their representative. Once a bill is introduced, it is assigned to a committee that researches, discusses, and makes changes to the bill. The committees provide intensive consideration of a proposed measure and a forum for the public to be heard. There are 20 standing committees in the House and 16 in the Senate, with members serving on a small number of committees and often for many years, allowing them to become highly knowledgeable in certain policy areas.

After the committee stage, the bill is put before the chamber to be voted on. If the bill passes one body of Congress, it goes through a similar process in the other body, including research, discussion, changes, and voting. Once both bodies accept a bill, they must work out any differences between the two versions. Amendments may be offered during debates, and each amendment must be inserted into the bill with the same spelling and punctuation as adopted by the House. The Enrolling Clerk is responsible for preparing a copy of the bill in the precise form it passed the House and sending it to the Senate.

Congress has the prerogative and responsibility to oversee policy implementation once a law is enacted.

Frequently asked questions