Humanitarian Law And Hamas: A Complex Legal Question

The conflict between Israel and Hamas in Gaza has been the subject of much scrutiny under international humanitarian law. Both parties have been accused of violating international humanitarian law, which governs the conduct of hostilities during an armed conflict. Hamas, in particular, has been accused of indiscriminate rocket fire, extrajudicial violence, and using human shields. While the applicability of international humanitarian law to Hamas is not in question, the group's compliance with its obligations under this legal framework has been a matter of significant concern.

Does international humanitarian law apply to Hamas's firing of rockets at Israel?

The armed conflict between Israel and Hamas is governed by international treaty law, as well as the rules of customary international humanitarian law. This includes the Geneva Conventions of 1949, to which Israel is a party, which sets forth minimum standards for all parties to a non-international armed conflict.

International humanitarian law provides protections for civilians and other non-combatants, requiring parties to a conflict to distinguish between combatants and civilians, who may never be the deliberate target of attacks.

Hamas and other Palestinian armed groups have an obligation to abide by international humanitarian law. While the targeting of military installations and other military objectives is permitted, Hamas must take all feasible precautions to avoid civilian harm and is prohibited from targeting civilians, launching indiscriminate attacks, or causing disproportionate harm to civilians.

The rockets fired by Hamas are considered to be so inaccurate as to be incapable of being aimed in a manner that discriminates between military targets and civilian objects. Statements from Hamas officials indicate that they are directing their rockets at Israeli population centers. The use of such rockets against civilian areas violates the prohibition on deliberate and indiscriminate attacks.

Therefore, Hamas's firing of rockets at Israel is unlawful under international humanitarian law.

Does international humanitarian law apply to Hamas's treatment of missing persons?

International humanitarian law (IHL) applies to all parties in an armed conflict, including non-state armed groups such as Hamas. IHL contains provisions that aim to prevent people from going missing and to establish their fate when they do.

IHL and human rights law require parties to a conflict to take measures to ensure that people do not go missing in an armed conflict. If they do go missing, the parties are required to take all possible measures to ensure their fate is known and their families informed. This includes recording the identities of combatants, registering deaths and burials, and keeping records of detainees and arrests.

The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) has consistently reminded Hamas of its legal and humanitarian obligations with regard to missing persons. The ICRC states that missing persons, regardless of their status, are protected by humanitarian law, and that their families must be shown due regard under the law. This includes the right to know the fate of missing relatives, which is a fundamental principle of humanitarian law.

Hamas has been accused of violating IHL by engaging in the indiscriminate firing of rockets at civilian locations and extrajudicial violence within the Gaza Strip. These actions would constitute war crimes under IHL.

While IHL does not specifically address the legal status of missing persons or provide for measures of reparation or assistance for their families, these issues are addressed in the International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance (ICPPED). The ICPPED defines enforced disappearance as:

> "arrest, detention, abduction or any other form of deprivation of liberty by agents of the State or by persons or groups of persons acting with the authorisation, support or acquiescence of the State, followed by a refusal to acknowledge the deprivation of liberty or by concealment of the fate or whereabouts of the disappeared person, which place such a person outside the protection of the law."

The ICPPED requires states to provide families of forcibly disappeared persons with measures of reparation, including compensation, and to take steps to regulate the legal status of the missing person.

In conclusion, while IHL does apply to Hamas' treatment of missing persons, the specific obligations and protections relevant to missing persons and their families are primarily found in the ICPPED.

Does international humanitarian law apply to Hamas's use of human shields?

International humanitarian law applies to the conflict between Israel and Hamas and other Palestinian armed groups. This includes the rules of customary international humanitarian law, as well as the treaty law, most importantly Common Article 3 to the Geneva Conventions of 1949, to which Israel is a party. International humanitarian law provides protections for civilians and other non-combatants, requiring all sides in a conflict to distinguish between combatants and civilians. Civilians may never be the deliberate target of attacks, and warring parties are required to take all feasible precautions to minimise harm to civilians and refrain from attacks that fail to discriminate between combatants and civilians, or that cause disproportionate harm to the civilian population.

Hamas and other Palestinian armed groups are therefore bound by international humanitarian law and have an obligation to abide by it. This means that Hamas must take all feasible precautions to avoid civilian harm and refrain from targeting civilians, launching indiscriminate attacks, or causing disproportionate harm to civilians.

Hamas has been accused of using human shields, which is a violation of international humanitarian law. Human shields refer to the purposeful use of the presence of civilians to render military forces or areas immune from attack. There have been several reports and testimonies from human rights groups and the UN alleging that Hamas has used human shields. For instance, a report from the UN team responsible for the protection of children in war zones found "hundreds" of violations of children's rights and accused Israeli soldiers of using children as human shields. The UK newspaper, The Guardian, also conducted an investigation that uncovered evidence of war crimes, including the use of Palestinian children as human shields. In addition, a report by Human Rights Watch (HRW) in 2009 noted that Hamas had used human shields during the war, with Palestinian armed groups intentionally hiding behind civilians to unlawfully use them as shields to deter Israeli counter-attacks.

However, it is important to note that there are conflicting accounts and interpretations of events, and some reports have contradicted or disputed these allegations. For example, Amnesty International's comprehensive report in July 2009 found no evidence that Palestinian militants had forced civilians to stay in buildings used for military purposes, contradicting Israeli claims that Hamas repeatedly used "human shields".

While Hamas is subject to international humanitarian law, the determination of whether their actions or specific incidents involving human shields violate international humanitarian law would require a detailed legal analysis and is beyond the scope of this response.

Does international humanitarian law apply to Hamas's targeting of civilians?

International Humanitarian Law (IHL) applies to both state and non-state actors involved in conflict. This includes Israel and Palestinian armed groups such as Hamas and Islamic Jihad.

IHL, or the laws of war, is designed to limit harm to non-combatants and protect civilians, wounded and sick soldiers, health and humanitarian workers, and prisoners of war. Civilians may not be attacked or taken hostage, and combatants must distinguish between civilian and military targets. Even when attacking a military target, combatants must take precautions to avoid or minimise harm to civilians.

Hamas has committed several violations of IHL and war crimes, including the deliberate killing of civilians, taking hostages, indiscriminate rocket attacks, and using civilians as human shields. Their actions have resulted in the deaths of over 1,400 Israelis, the majority of whom were civilians, and the taking of more than 200 hostages.

IHL also applies to Israel's conduct in the conflict. While Israel is justified in responding to Hamas' attacks, it must adhere to the principles of IHL, including the distinction between military and civilian targets, proportionality in acts of self-defence and retaliation, and the protection of civilians.

There are concerns that Israel may have violated IHL through its targeting processes, the extensive devastation caused to civilian infrastructure in Gaza, and its blockade of the territory. Israel has conducted over 7,000 strikes in Gaza, resulting in the deaths of thousands of Palestinians, including civilians and children. The high number of airstrikes in a densely populated area and the significant loss of life raise doubts about Israel's compliance with IHL.

Both Israel and Hamas have committed violations of IHL and war crimes during the conflict. The application of IHL is crucial to ensure the protection of civilians and the humane treatment of all parties involved in the conflict.

Does international humanitarian law apply to Hamas's use of weapons?

International humanitarian law applies to the conflict between Israel and Hamas and other Palestinian armed groups. This includes the rules of customary international humanitarian law and treaty law, such as Common Article 3 to the Geneva Conventions of 1949, to which Israel is a party. These laws set forth minimum standards for all parties to a non-international armed conflict, including non-state armed groups like Hamas.

International humanitarian law provides protections for civilians and other non-combatants during armed conflict. It requires parties to a conflict to distinguish between combatants and civilians, and to target only combatants and other military objectives. Civilians may never be the deliberate target of attacks, and warring parties are required to take all feasible precautions to minimize harm to civilians and civilian objects.

Hamas, as a party to the armed conflict, is obligated to abide by international humanitarian law. This includes taking all feasible precautions to avoid civilian harm, refraining from targeting civilians, and refraining from indiscriminate attacks or attacks that would cause disproportionate harm to civilians. Hamas must also refrain from placing civilians in Gaza at risk by firing rockets from within populated areas.

Hamas has been accused of violating international humanitarian law through the indiscriminate firing of rockets at civilian locations and extrajudicial violence within the Gaza Strip. These actions, if proven, would constitute war crimes.

In conclusion, international humanitarian law does apply to Hamas' use of weapons, and Hamas has an obligation to comply with these laws to protect civilian lives and adhere to acceptable standards of conduct in war.

Frequently asked questions