Georgia's Abortion Law: Understanding The Controversial Legislation

Abortion laws in Georgia have been the subject of much debate and legal back-and-forth in recent years. In 2019, Georgia's Republican Governor, Brian Kemp, signed the Heartbeat abortion bill, also known as the Living Infants Fairness and Equality Act, into law. This law made abortions after the detection of embryonic cardiac-cell activity, which typically occurs around the six-week mark of a pregnancy, illegal. However, this law was recently, in September 2024, deemed 'unconstitutional' and overturned by a Georgia superior court judge. The law currently remains in effect while the state appeals the ruling.

The six-week abortion ban

Georgia's six-week abortion ban prohibits most abortions after fetal cardiac activity is detected, which typically occurs around six weeks after the last menstrual period. This leaves pregnant individuals with a very limited window of time to get an abortion, as many are unaware they are pregnant before this point. The ban includes exceptions for rape and incest survivors, but only if they have a police report documenting the offense. Medical exceptions are also included in the ban, allowing abortions to be carried out if it is necessary to prevent the patient's death or substantial physical impairment, or in the case of ectopic pregnancies. In addition, in some cases, abortions may be permitted if a fetal anomaly is detected that is incompatible with sustaining life.

The six-week ban has had devastating consequences for people seeking abortions in Georgia, forcing them to travel out of state or continue with unwanted pregnancies. The ban has also been linked to the deaths of at least two women, Amber Nicole Thurman and Candi Miller, who were unable to access timely and necessary medical care due to the restrictive abortion laws. Their deaths have been deemed "preventable" by experts, highlighting the dangerous impact of abortion bans on individuals' health and lives.

The ban was initially passed in 2019 by Governor Brian Kemp but was blocked by a federal court in 2022. However, in October 2023, the Georgia Supreme Court allowed the ban to remain in place, and it continues to have a detrimental effect on the lives of Georgians. The Superior Court of Fulton County has ruled that the Georgia Constitution protects abortion and blocks the six-week ban, but the state's attorney general can choose to appeal this ruling and reinstate the ban.

Exceptions to the ban

Georgia's abortion ban prohibits most abortions after fetal cardiac activity is detected, which typically occurs six weeks after the last menstrual period. While the ban includes some exceptions, these are limited.

• Preventing death or substantial physical impairment: Abortion is permitted if it is necessary to prevent the patient's death or substantial physical impairment. This includes the case of ectopic pregnancy, where the fetus develops outside the uterus and is not viable, which can be life-threatening for the pregnant person.
• Rape and incest: Abortion is allowed in cases of rape and incest, but a police report documenting the offense is required. The time limit for abortions in these cases is up to 20 weeks after the last menstrual period.
• Fetal anomalies: Abortion may be permitted in cases of profound congenital or chromosomal anomalies in the fetus that are incompatible with sustaining life. A statement from a Maternal Fetal Health Specialist is required to confirm that the fetus has such anomalies. The time limit for abortions in these cases is also up to 20 weeks.
• Miscarriages: The ban applies to miscarriages, and additional care to complete a partial miscarriage can only be provided if no fetal cardiac activity is detected.

The impact of the ban on maternal mortality

In 2019, Georgia Governor Brian Kemp signed the "Heartbeat" abortion bill, also known as the Living Infants Fairness and Equality Act, into law. This law made abortions after six weeks of pregnancy illegal, with exceptions for rape and incest, as long as a police report was filed. Another exception allowed abortions after six weeks if the mother's life was at risk or if a serious medical condition rendered the fetus non-viable.

In October 2023, the Georgia Supreme Court upheld the "Heartbeat" abortion law, and it went into effect following the Supreme Court's overturning of Roe v. Wade in June 2022. The impact of this ban on maternal mortality in Georgia is yet to be seen, but studies from other states with similar restrictions suggest that maternal mortality rates increase when abortion access is restricted.

Research has shown that states with more restrictive abortion policies have higher rates of maternal and infant mortality. A study by Tulane researchers found that states with more abortion restrictions had a 7% increase in total maternal mortality compared to states with fewer restrictions. Specifically, states requiring a licensed physician to perform abortions had a 51% higher total maternal mortality rate, and restrictions on state Medicaid funding for abortions were associated with a 29% higher total maternal mortality rate.

Another study on the impact of the 2021 Texas abortion ban found that infant deaths in the state increased by 12.9% between 2021 and 2022, compared to a 1.8% increase in the rest of the United States. This suggests that restrictive abortion policies can lead to unintended consequences, such as increased infant mortality and potential trauma to families.

Overall, the ban on abortion in Georgia is likely to have a significant impact on maternal mortality rates in the state. Restrictive abortion policies have been consistently linked to higher maternal and infant mortality rates, particularly among women of color, indicating that making abortion illegal threatens the health and lives of all women of reproductive age.

The legal challenges to the law

The Georgia abortion law, known as the LIFE Act, has faced several legal challenges since its introduction in 2019. The law prohibits most abortions once a physician can detect the supposed cardiac activity of the fetus, which typically occurs around six weeks into a pregnancy. This law has been criticised for lacking a scientific basis, as medical authorities agree that the fetal heart does not form until at least nine or ten weeks into a pregnancy.

The law has faced challenges in both state and federal courts. Initially, a federal court in Georgia granted an injunction blocking the LIFE Act as it conflicted with Roe v. Wade. However, after the ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization in 2022, which overturned Roe v. Wade, a federal appeals court overturned the lower court's order, allowing the "heartbeat law" to take effect.

The legal battle then moved to the state courts, with abortion rights supporters obtaining a brief injunction blocking the law when the Fulton County Superior Court Judge Robert McBurney issued a ruling in their favour. However, on appeal, the Georgia Supreme Court reinstated the abortion ban and remanded the case back to the trial court to review the remaining state law claims.

The Georgia LIFE Act has continued to face legal challenges, with a superior court recently ruling that parts of the law are unconstitutional under the Georgia constitution. Despite this, the state Supreme Court quickly reinstated the ban during the appeal process, demonstrating the back-and-forth nature of the legal challenges.

The law has also faced criticism for its lack of clarity regarding prosecution. Unlike other jurisdictions, the LIFE Act does not explicitly state that a pregnant woman will not be prosecuted for an unlawful abortion, leading to fears that local district attorneys may file charges to test the law. This uncertainty has potentially serious implications for women's reproductive rights and access to safe abortion services in Georgia.

The legal challenges to the Georgia abortion law have been ongoing, with abortion rights supporters and opponents presenting their cases in both state and federal courts. The back-and-forth nature of the rulings highlights the contentious nature of the issue and the ongoing struggle to define the legal boundaries of abortion access in the state.

The political response to the law

The political response to Georgia's abortion law has been mixed, with some celebrating the law and others expressing outrage. Here is a detailed breakdown of the political responses:

Support for the Law

Governor Brian Kemp, who signed the bill into law in 2019, expressed disappointment with the ruling, stating that "protecting the lives of the most vulnerable among us is one of our most sacred responsibilities, and Georgia will continue to be a place where we fight for the lives of the unborn." He also criticised the judge's decision as being based on "personal beliefs" rather than the will of the people of Georgia.

Claire Bartlett, executive director of the Georgia Life Alliance, echoed similar sentiments, expressing confidence that the Georgia Supreme Court would overturn the ruling. She argued that the judge, Robert McBurney, was wrong to interpret the state's constitution as protecting a woman's right to liberty over the life of the unborn child.

Carol Tobias, president of the National Right to Life Committee, called the ruling "ridiculous" and described Judge McBurney as an "activist judge" who was ignoring higher court rulings.

Opposition to the Law

On the other hand, abortion rights supporters have welcomed the ruling, with Monica Simpson, executive director of SisterSong Women of Color Reproductive Justice Collective, stating that they were "encouraged that a Georgia court has ruled for bodily autonomy." However, Simpson also highlighted the devastating consequences of the ban, including the deaths of Amber Nicole Thurman and Candi Miller, who were unable to access legal abortions.

Vice President Kamala Harris has also been a vocal critic of Georgia's abortion law, citing the deaths of Thurman and Miller as evidence of the need to expand abortion access. Harris has argued that the law delays life-saving care for women, stating that "public health policy should not wait until someone is at death's door before they get care."

In response to the political debate, some doctors and lawmakers in Georgia have pushed back against the narrative that the state's abortion law led directly to Thurman's death. They argue that complications from abortion pills and other factors were the primary causes, and that the law includes exceptions to protect the life of the mother.

Legal Challenges

The law is currently facing legal challenges, with the Georgia Attorney General, Chris Carr, immediately appealing the ruling to the state supreme court. The state high court had previously reversed a separate ruling by Judge McBurney that had struck down the law on different grounds. As the legal battle continues, abortion providers in Georgia are navigating uncertainty, with some expanding services and others fearful of a potential reversal of the ruling.

Frequently asked questions