Understanding Legal Rights: Non-Citizens And The Law

The laws that apply to non-citizens vary depending on the country in question. In the United States, for example, non-citizens are subject to federal, state, and local government laws. They have the right to due process and a jury trial in certain court proceedings, the right to payment for their work, and the right to defend against deportation, among others. However, some Constitutional rights, such as the right to vote, are reserved solely for U.S. citizens.

Characteristics of Laws that Apply to Non-Citizens

The right to due process

Constitutional Protections

The US Constitution guarantees the right to due process to all "persons," not just citizens, which means that non-citizens are entitled to the same constitutional protections as citizens in this regard. The Fifth Amendment states that "no person ... shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." This amendment protects individuals from self-incrimination and ensures that they receive a fair and impartial hearing before being deprived of their life, liberty, or property.

Immigration Proceedings

In the context of immigration, the right to due process means that non-citizens facing deportation or removal proceedings have the right to a fair hearing, legal representation, and the opportunity to present their case and defences. They cannot be denied their right to appear before an immigration judge and be heard. However, there is an exception to the right to due process in cases of expedited removal, where immigrants who have been in the country illegally for less than two years and are apprehended within 100 miles of the border can be deported immediately without a court hearing.

Criminal Proceedings

Non-citizens charged with criminal offences have the same due process rights as citizens, including the right to a speedy and public trial by jury, protection against unlawful searches and seizures, and the right to an attorney. Their status as non-citizens does not affect the criminal trial procedure, including the burden of proof and the presumption of innocence.

Civil Lawsuits

Non-citizens also have the right to file civil lawsuits under federal law to seek redress for violations of their rights. The Fourteenth Amendment holds that the government cannot deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process, and this applies to everyone, regardless of immigration status.

International Law

Additionally, international human rights law guarantees certain inalienable rights to all humans, regardless of citizenship. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1976) affirm the right to due process and fair procedure for all individuals, including non-citizens.

The right to legal counsel

The Supreme Court does not consider deportation charges a criminal offence, which means that undocumented immigrants do not have the same rights as they would in a criminal proceeding, such as the right to have Miranda rights read to them, the right to an attorney, and the right to a jury trial. This has resulted in many non-citizens being refused the right to an attorney.

However, in certain states, such as New York, non-citizens charged with deportable offences will have the right to a trial by jury. Additionally, anyone who is detained and criminally interrogated, including non-citizens, has the right to be read their Miranda warning, which informs them of their right to remain silent, their right to an attorney, and that anything they say can be used against them in a court of law.

The right to a jury trial

This right applies to all people in the U.S., including citizens, foreign tourists, and non-citizen residents. In 2018, New York's highest court affirmed that non-citizens are entitled to a jury trial under the Sixth Amendment if they face deportable offenses, even if they are charged with a misdemeanor that carries a sentence of less than six months in jail.

The jury's role in a trial is to act as the trier of fact and determine guilt or innocence based on the evidence presented. Serving as a juror is a civic duty for U.S. citizens who meet the eligibility criteria, which include being at least 18 years old, living in the county where they are called for jury duty, being able to communicate in English, and having the physical and mental capacity to serve.

The right to protection against self-incrimination

Legal Basis and History:

The right against self-incrimination is enshrined in various legal documents and has a long history:

• United States: The Fifth Amendment of the US Constitution explicitly states that "no person ... shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself." This right has been further clarified and expanded upon through landmark Supreme Court cases such as Miranda v. Arizona, which established the Miranda rights that ensure individuals in police custody are informed of their right to remain silent and their right to an attorney.
• United Kingdom: In England and Wales, the Criminal Evidence Act 1898 s1(2) provides the statutory basis for the privilege against self-incrimination. Additionally, the country's history of English common law has influenced the development of this right in other nations.
• Canada: The Charter of Rights and Freedoms includes provisions similar to the US Fifth Amendment, protecting individuals from being compelled to testify against themselves.
• Australia: While Australia has a limited right against self-incrimination at common law, it is not explicitly protected in the federal constitution or at the state level.
• India: Under Article 20 (3) of the Indian Constitution, defendants have the right against self-incrimination, but this right is not extended to witnesses.
• China: China has recognized the right against self-incrimination and prohibited forced confessions in its Criminal Procedure Law. Additionally, China's accession to the United Nations' International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights guarantees its citizens this right.
• International Law: The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1976) affirm the rights of all individuals, regardless of citizenship, to fundamental freedoms and fair procedures.

Application and Implications:

The right against self-incrimination has significant implications for both citizens and non-citizens:

• Protection from Coercion: This right ensures that no individual can be forced to incriminate themselves or provide information that could lead to criminal charges. It allows individuals to remain silent or refuse to answer questions without fear of punishment.
• Due Process: The right against self-incrimination is closely tied to the concept of due process, which guarantees fair legal proceedings. It ensures that individuals cannot be deprived of their liberty or property without just and equitable legal processes.
• Limitations and Exceptions: While this right provides robust protection, there are certain limitations and exceptions. For example, in the US, the Supreme Court has ruled that organizations and unlawful aliens do not have the same right against self-incrimination as individuals. Additionally, the right may not apply in civil cases or when national security or public order concerns arise.
• Immigration Context: Non-citizens, including undocumented immigrants, are generally afforded the same protection against self-incrimination as citizens. However, their legal status may impact how this right is applied. Immigration proceedings, for instance, often fall under civil law, where the right may not apply as strongly as in criminal cases.
• Global Variations: The specific application and interpretation of this right can vary across different legal systems. While some countries have robust protections, others may have weaker implementations or even disregard this right, as evidenced by practices like forced confessions.

In conclusion, the right to protection against self-incrimination is a crucial safeguard in criminal justice systems worldwide, protecting both citizens and non-citizens from being compelled to provide self-incriminating information. While there are variations in its application and certain exceptions, this right remains a fundamental aspect of fair and just legal proceedings.

The right to a safe work environment

To promote and ensure these rights, countries have established specific industrial legislation, such as the Fair Work Act and work health and safety laws. Additionally, international instruments like the International Labour Organization (ILO) conventions address the rights of migrant workers, including their freedom of expression, protection from discrimination, and right to procedurally fair processes.

In summary, the right to a safe work environment is a fundamental human right that is applicable to all individuals, regardless of their citizenship status. This right is protected by international laws and enforced through national legislation and policies, ensuring that workers can carry out their jobs without risking their health and safety.

Frequently asked questions