Armed Services: Special Laws And Procedures Explained

Military law is a body of law that governs the members of the armed forces. Military law is different from martial law, which is when military authority replaces civilian authority. Military law can be applied to civilians, but only in special circumstances, such as if a nation declares martial law.

In the United States, military law is found in the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), which is applied to all branches of the military. The UCMJ covers offenses specific to military officials, as well as ordinary civilian crimes, but has a different standard of proof and a different set of punishments. The UCMJ establishes a separate military court system, the courts-martial, in which trials involving military service personnel take place.

The Posse Comitatus Act is a United States federal law that limits the powers of the federal government in the use of federal military personnel to enforce domestic policies within the United States. The Act prohibits the use of the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, and Space Force as a posse comitatus to execute the laws, except in certain circumstances.

The Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)

The UCMJ allows for both judicial and non-judicial punishment. Non-judicial punishment, also known as Article 15, is imposed by a commander and is used to deal with minor violations. While it is administrative in nature, it can have significant negative consequences on a service member's career. Service members offered non-judicial punishment have the right to refuse and demand trial by court-martial. They also have the right to consult with counsel before making this decision. If a service member accepts non-judicial punishment, they waive their right to a trial by court-martial, and the commander becomes the judge and jury. The commander must consider the member's side of the case and any witnesses or evidence presented before deciding on guilt and punishment.

The UCMJ also provides for judicial punishment through courts-martial. There are three types of courts-martial: summary, special, and general. Each type has different procedures and consequences, with a summary court-martial being the least formal and a general court-martial the most serious, potentially resulting in a federal conviction. Service members facing any type of court-martial should seek legal advice to understand their rights and the potential implications of the proceedings.

The UCMJ is a comprehensive code of laws that ensures discipline and accountability in the US armed forces. It provides a framework for handling offenses, protecting the rights of service members, and maintaining the integrity of the military justice system.

Military vs. Martial Law

Military law refers to the laws and regulations that govern the conduct of members of the armed forces. These laws can include a wide range of matters, such as discipline, pay and benefits, and the use of force. On the other hand, martial law refers to the temporary substitution of military authority for civilian rule, typically during times of war, civil unrest, or natural disaster.

During martial law, the military commander of an area or country assumes unlimited authority to make and enforce laws, suspending civil liberties and habeas corpus. Martial law is often imposed when civilian authority has ceased to function or is deemed ineffective. While it can be declared by a country's leader, such as the president or state governor in the United States, it is usually a last resort due to its negative ramifications.

In the United States, martial law has been declared or imposed about 68 times, mostly by state governors and local military commanders. Examples include General Andrew Jackson's declaration during the War of 1812 and Abraham Lincoln's declaration in border states during the Civil War. The use of martial law is controversial, and courts have often ruled that it is unconstitutional or too broadly applied.

While military law pertains to the internal regulation of armed forces, martial law refers to the temporary substitution of military rule for civilian governance during crises.

Military Justice System

Military law is a body of law that oversees the members of the armed forces. Military law is different from martial law, which refers to the military enforcement of order on a civilian population. Military law is a system of government for military members, who are subject to different rules and expectations than ordinary civilian citizens.

The military justice system is based on the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), which applies to all branches of the military. The UCMJ is federal law and is located in Title 10 United States Code Chapter 47. It was established by the United States Congress in accordance with their constitutional authority, per Article I Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution, which provides that "The Congress shall have Power . . . to make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval forces" of the United States. The UCMJ contains a list of crimes and offenses, rules for trials and sentencing, and is similar to civilian law but stricter in several areas.

The UCMJ covers offenses specific to military officials, such as high crimes and misdemeanors, perjury of oath, abuse of authority, bribery, intimidation, misuse of assets, failure to supervise, and dereliction of duty. It also covers ordinary civilian crimes but has a different standard of proof and a different set of punishments than civilian courts. Punishments for violating the UCMJ range from a loss of privileges to confinement and discharge. All active-duty personnel, activated reservists, guard members, and even retired members of the military are subject to the UCMJ at all times. If a military member commits a crime while off-duty and unrelated to military matters, they are still subject to the UCMJ in addition to civilian penalties.

When a military member commits an offense, the member's immediate commander is usually responsible for how the offense should be charged. For more serious offenses, the military or security police investigators have the authority to investigate and charge, while criminal investigative agencies handle the most serious offenses. A commander has several options: to take no action, take administrative action, use non-judicial punishment, or try the offender by court-martial. Judge advocates usually prosecute and defend the accused. A court-martial conviction can be appealed through the military courts and the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces (USCAAF). The Supreme Court of the United States has discretion to review cases under the UCMJ on direct appeal.

Military Law vs. Civilian Law

Military law and civilian law are two distinct legal systems with different purposes, jurisdictions, and procedures. Understanding these differences is crucial for those navigating the complex legal landscape.

Civilian law is designed to prevent undesirable behavior, ensure public safety, and resolve disputes peacefully. It operates within a federal system where local, state, and federal regulations are enforced by various law enforcement agencies, courts, and judges. In contrast, military law emphasizes discipline and operates under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), a separate legal framework designed specifically for the armed forces. Military law falls under the jurisdiction of the UCMJ and is enforced by military judges, prosecutors, and defense attorneys.

One significant difference lies in the investigative agencies involved. Civilian cases are typically handled by civilian law enforcement agencies, while military cases involve military investigative agencies such as the Naval Criminal Investigative Service (NCIS) or the Army Criminal Investigation Command (CID). The chain of command within the military also plays a crucial role in how a case is approached and defended, requiring a deep understanding of military regulations and procedures.

The types of offenses prosecuted under military law and civilian law also differ. Military law includes offenses related to military discipline, conduct unbecoming an officer, desertion, insubordination, and more. These offenses are designed to maintain good order and discipline in the armed forces. On the other hand, civilian law focuses on a broader range of offenses that are not specific to the military context.

The impact of a conviction varies between the two systems. In military law, a conviction can have severe consequences on an individual's military career, including dishonorable discharge, reduction in rank, loss of benefits, and incarceration in a military prison. In civilian law, while convictions can also result in imprisonment and fines, they generally do not carry the same impact on an individual's civilian career or standing in society.

Lastly, the legal proceedings and protections differ between the two systems. Court-martial processes in military law are typically more streamlined than civilian trials. Military judges and jury members are also service members, and the procedures, rights, and legal protections can vary significantly from those in civilian courts. For example, the jury size is often smaller, and unanimous verdicts are not always required for conviction in military courts.

Military Contractors

PMCs offer a range of services, including military training, security, and protection. They can be hired to supplement or train armed forces, and provide bodyguards for government employees in hostile territories. They may also provide more general services, such as preparing meals for soldiers or driving supply trucks.

The legal status of military contractors is complex and varies depending on the context. Contractors are generally considered civilians under international law and are not subject to military law, except during a declared war. They can, however, lose their legal protection if they directly support military operations and, in such cases, can be subject to direct attack if they participate in hostilities.

Contractors can be held responsible for committing war crimes, and states have an obligation to prosecute and punish perpetrators of war crimes, regardless of their nationality or where the crime was committed. Contractors may be prosecuted under U.S. federal law, such as the Military Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Act of 2000, which allows for the prosecution of U.S. civilians who commit certain crimes while employed by or accompanying U.S. forces abroad.

The use of military contractors has raised legal and ethical concerns, particularly regarding their involvement in interrogations, torture, and other human rights violations. The regulation of PMCs and the accountability of contractors remain ongoing challenges, with some arguing that outsourcing security can compromise the neutrality of organisations and lead to increased risks.

Frequently asked questions