Texas Abortion Law: What You Need To Know

Texas has some of the most restrictive abortion laws in the US. Abortion is illegal in Texas at all stages of pregnancy unless the pregnant person's life is in danger. The state's abortion law, also known as the Texas Heartbeat Act, makes it illegal for a physician to knowingly perform or induce an abortion if they detect a foetal heartbeat, which is usually found around six weeks of pregnancy. The law does not make exceptions for rape, sexual abuse, incest, or fetal anomaly diagnoses. It allows any private citizen to sue abortion providers who violate the law, as well as anyone who aids or abets a woman getting the procedure. The Supreme Court upheld the Texas Heartbeat Act in December 2021 and refused to intervene in an emergency abortion case in October 2024.

The Texas Heartbeat Act

The Act was introduced as Senate Bill 8 and House Bill 1515, and was signed into law by Governor Greg Abbott on May 19, 2021. It is one of the strictest abortion laws in the United States, with only narrow exemptions for the life and health of pregnant people. The law does not make exceptions for cases involving rape, sexual abuse, incest, or fetal anomaly diagnoses.

The Supreme Court upheld the Texas Heartbeat Act in December 2021, preventing abortion providers from suing state officials and maintaining the Act's focus on private citizen enforcement. The Court's decision not to block the Act has been criticised by public health experts and organisations dedicated to female health and reproductive rights, who argue that it will negatively impact access to healthcare and the rights of women and other people assigned female at birth.

The law's implications for women's health and safety

The Texas abortion law, also known as the Texas Heartbeat Act or Senate Bill 8 (SB8), has significant implications for women's health and safety. The law bans abortions after a fetal heartbeat is detected, which typically occurs around six weeks into a pregnancy. This timeframe has been criticised as many women may not be aware they are pregnant within this timeframe, especially as some people have irregular periods due to conditions such as polycystic ovary syndrome or hyperthyroidism, or factors such as stress, perimenopause, hormonal changes, and birth control medication.

The law has been contested by public health experts and organisations dedicated to safeguarding female health, who argue that it will negatively impact menstruating people's access to time-sensitive healthcare. The law also does not make exceptions for cases of rape, sexual abuse, incest, or fetal anomaly diagnoses, which further limits women's reproductive rights and access to healthcare.

The Texas abortion law also facilitates a system of reporting and suing anyone suspected of breaking the law, including people seeking an abortion after six weeks, any organisation or individual helping someone seeking a post-six-week abortion, and any medical professional providing abortions after the cut-off point. This provision has been criticised for encouraging community members to actively report and sue those suspected of breaking the law, creating a culture of fear and deterring people from seeking legal abortions.

The law is expected to disproportionately impact low-income women and women of colour, particularly Black women, who already face significant healthcare inequities. Women who are denied abortions have an increased likelihood of unemployment, poverty, and remaining in contact with violent partners, putting themselves and their children at risk. The law will also likely result in an increase in women accessing government-funded services due to homelessness, abandonment, abuse, emergency room visits, child protective services involvement, and job loss, among other barriers.

Additionally, the Texas abortion law will deepen healthcare disparities for people with undocumented status and people with HIV, who already face significant discrimination and challenges in accessing healthcare. The law effectively pushes an agenda of controlling women's bodies and ignores the fact that abortion care is medically necessary, time-sensitive, and essential.

Who can be sued under the law

The Texas abortion law, known as Senate Bill 8 (SB 8), allows private citizens to sue anyone who knowingly "aids or abets" an abortion. This includes doctors and abortion providers, as well as those who provide transportation to a clinic or help fund an abortion. The law instructs courts to award plaintiffs at least $10,000 in damages from defendants if they are successful in their lawsuits. The threat of these lawsuits has been enough to discourage providers from performing abortions in the state, with the number of abortions in Texas dropping by half in the month after the law took effect.

State officials cannot be sued under SB 8. In one case, a Texas abortion clinic tried to block the law by suing the Texas attorney general, state judges, court clerks, and others who would be involved in lawsuits to enforce the law, but they were unsuccessful.

In addition to SB 8, there are several other Texas abortion-related statutes that allow abortion providers or those assisting with an abortion to be sued or fined. For example, Section 33.012 of the Texas Family Code allows the Attorney General to impose a civil fine on doctors who perform abortions on unemancipated minors, and Section 171.006 of the Texas Health and Safety Code allows the Attorney General to sue physicians who do not report abortion complications as required. Section 171.104 of the same code allows the father of the fetus or the parents of an underage mother to sue if the fetus was aborted using a partial-birth abortion.

Texas is also attempting to access out-of-state abortion medical records, with Attorney General Ken Paxton leading a legal challenge to the federal government's policy protecting patient privacy.

The law's effect on abortion providers

The Texas abortion law, also known as the Texas Heartbeat Act or Senate Bill 8 (SB8), has had a significant impact on abortion providers in the state. The law makes it illegal for a physician to knowingly perform or induce an abortion if a fetal heartbeat is detected, which usually occurs around six weeks of pregnancy. This has effectively banned most abortions in Texas, as many people are unaware they are pregnant before this point.

The law also delegates enforcement to private citizens, who can sue abortion providers for violating the law. This means that abortion providers can face legal action from anyone who believes they have performed an illegal abortion, creating a challenging and uncertain environment for those offering abortion services. The law allows for civil suits related to prohibited abortions, with a minimum penalty of $100,000 in addition to any other civil liabilities. Providers also risk losing their license or permit to practice.

The impact of the law on abortion providers is exacerbated by the lack of exceptions for cases of rape, incest, or fetal anomaly diagnoses. This means that abortion providers cannot offer their services in these situations, even if the patient requests it. The only exception is when the life or health of the pregnant person is at risk, and even then, certain criteria must be met. For example, a licensed physician must perform the abortion, and they must try to save the life of the fetus unless doing so increases the risk to the patient.

The Texas abortion law has faced strong opposition from public health experts and organizations dedicated to safeguarding female health, such as Planned Parenthood. They argue that the law will negatively impact menstruating individuals' access to time-sensitive healthcare and will disproportionately affect low-income individuals and Black women. Despite these concerns, the Supreme Court upheld the Texas Heartbeat Act in December 2021 and declined to intervene in an emergency abortion case in October 2024, indicating that abortion providers in Texas will continue to face significant challenges in providing their services.

The law's constitutionality

The Texas abortion law, also known as the Texas Heartbeat Act or Senate Bill 8 (SB8), has raised questions and concerns about its constitutionality. The law bans abortions after the detection of a fetal heartbeat, which typically occurs around six weeks into a pregnancy – a point at which many people may not be aware of their pregnancy. This provision has been criticised as effectively banning abortions in the state.

The law also stands out for its enforcement mechanism, which relies on private citizens to sue abortion providers and anyone aiding a woman in getting an abortion. This provision has been criticised for encouraging community members to report and sue those suspected of breaking the law, creating a system of surveillance and intimidation. The law allows anyone bringing a successful lawsuit to collect damages of at least $10,000, further incentivising private enforcement.

The Supreme Court's initial decision to uphold the Texas Heartbeat Act in December 2021 and its subsequent refusal to intervene in the state's abortion law in October 2024 have been seen as a significant curb to the constitutional right to abortion. The Court's inaction has been interpreted as giving a green light to other states to follow suit and enact similar restrictive abortion laws.

However, the constitutionality of the Texas abortion law remains contested. The ACLU of Texas and other partners are challenging the validity of the law in court, arguing that it violates the constitutional right to abortion established under Roe v. Wade. A judge in Harris County sided with abortion providers and issued a temporary restraining order blocking prosecutions under pre-Roe statutes. The legal battle over the Texas abortion law is ongoing, with the lawsuit moving through the courts.

Frequently asked questions