Abortion Laws: Two Critical Issues To Address

Abortion laws are a highly contentious issue that touches on moral, legal, medical, and religious aspects. Two problems with abortion laws are the criminalization of abortion and the social stigma associated with it. Criminalization of abortion can lead to unsafe abortions, especially in developing countries, resulting in fatal consequences such as maternal deaths and disabilities. It also reinforces intersectional discrimination and marginalization, hindering reproductive autonomy. On the other hand, the social stigma surrounding abortion makes it difficult for people to exercise their reproductive rights, even in places where it is legal. This stigma, along with factors like cost and distance to services, creates barriers to accessing safe and legal abortions.

Criminalisation of abortion

The criminalisation of abortion has far-reaching consequences, impacting people's health, human rights, and lives. It is a complex issue that varies across countries and regions, with some countries imposing outright bans, while others allowing it under specific circumstances. Here is an in-depth look at the criminalisation of abortion and its implications.

Impact on Health and Safety

The criminalisation of abortion often leads to unsafe abortion practices, putting people's health and lives at risk. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), unsafe abortions are a significant cause of maternal deaths and morbidities worldwide. In places where abortion is restricted or criminalised, people are forced to resort to unsafe methods, which can result in fatal consequences. The availability of safe abortion services is crucial in preventing these avoidable deaths and ensuring people's well-being.

Violation of Human Rights

The criminalisation of abortion infringes on individuals' human rights, including the right to life, health, bodily autonomy, and freedom from torture and cruel treatment. By denying people the ability to make decisions about their own bodies and reproductive health, criminalisation violates the fundamental principle of bodily autonomy. This issue disproportionately affects those from marginalised communities, who already face barriers in accessing health services.

Social and Economic Consequences

The criminalisation of abortion can have far-reaching social and economic impacts. It reinforces social stigma, marginalisation, and discrimination, especially for those from vulnerable communities. Additionally, it can lead to increased poverty, as people may struggle to cover the costs of travelling to another country or accessing private care. The lack of access to safe and legal abortion services can have long-lasting consequences on individuals' lives and well-being.

Global Variations in Criminalisation

The criminalisation of abortion varies across the globe, with different countries and regions having diverse laws and regulations. Some countries, like the United States, Sierra Leone, Poland, and Morocco, have strict laws criminalising abortion and providing harsh punishments. Other countries allow abortion under specific circumstances, such as when the pregnancy is a result of rape or incest, or if it poses a risk to the pregnant person's health. However, these exceptions are often narrow and do not address the needs of most people seeking abortions.

Efforts for Decriminalisation

There have been global efforts to decriminalise abortion and ensure safe and legal access. Human rights bodies, such as the United Nations Human Rights Committee and regional organisations, have played a significant role in calling for progressive abortion law reforms. Additionally, feminist groups and activists have advocated for the decriminalisation of abortion, recognising its impact on women's rights and health. These efforts have led to some successes, with countries like Canada effectively decriminalising abortion and others making strides towards reform.

In conclusion, the criminalisation of abortion has wide-ranging impacts on individuals' health, human rights, and lives. It reinforces stigma, marginalisation, and unsafe practices. However, there are ongoing efforts to decriminalise abortion and ensure that people have access to safe and legal abortion services as a fundamental aspect of their reproductive rights and health.

Social stigma of abortion

Abortion stigma is a set of attitudes and beliefs, conscious or unconscious, that abortion is "bad, shameful, or wrong". It is a shared understanding that abortion is "morally wrong and/or socially unacceptable". Stigma creates discomfort around abortion, which contributes to misinformation and a lack of knowledge about the topic. This, in turn, is used to build and maintain barriers to abortion, such as laws that restrict access, institutions that limit knowledge, and popular media that perpetuates misleading representations.

Abortion stigma harms people who have had abortions and people who provide abortions. It causes shame, silence, and isolation, making it harder for people to get care or ask for support when they need an abortion. Stigma perpetuates outdated gender norms, contributing to gender norms that harm women, people assigned female at birth, and people with feminine gender expressions.

Abortion stigma is about the "transgression of a gendered norm", which refers to the social expectations imposed on women, people assigned female at birth, and people with feminine gender expressions. These norms include the expectation of sexual purity, or sexuality reserved for reproduction, and the expectation of motherhood and nurturing. Having an abortion shows that someone had sex and did not become a parent. Abortion marks their rejection of specific gendered norms about sex, gender, and parenting.

Anti-abortion messages contribute to abortion stigma, too. It’s very common, including among supporters of abortion, to feel uncomfortable or uncertain about when, why, and at what point in a pregnancy it is okay to have an abortion. That discomfort is internalized abortion stigma. The only person who can decide when to have an abortion is the person who’s pregnant—they have the legal and moral right to decide for themselves.

Abortion stigma has real-world consequences. It is linked to psychological distress, with higher levels of perceived abortion stigma at the time of seeking an abortion associated with higher odds of experiencing psychological distress years later. It also leads to unsafe abortions, which are a leading cause of maternal deaths and morbidities. In places where abortion is stigmatised, criminalised, or restricted, people are forced to resort to unsafe abortions. It is estimated that 25 million unsafe abortions take place every year, leading to fatal consequences such as maternal deaths and disabilities.

Abortion stigma also intersects with other forms of discrimination and marginalisation, such as racism and classism, further exacerbating the harm caused. For example, in the United States, a history of White supremacy, racism, and social inequalities based on race and class likely lead to differences in perceptions and experiences of abortion stigma.

To reduce abortion stigma, it is important to address the underlying gender norms and power structures that contribute to it. This includes challenging the social expectations imposed on women and people assigned female at birth, as well as addressing the institutional and structural barriers that restrict access to abortion and perpetuate stigma.

Additionally, it is crucial to provide accurate information and education about abortion to counter misinformation and stigma. This includes ensuring that health care providers are trained to provide accurate and unbiased information, as well as challenging anti-abortion advocates who spread inflammatory disinformation.

By addressing abortion stigma, we can create a more supportive and accepting environment for people who have abortions and work towards ensuring that everyone has access to safe and legal abortion services.

Abortion bans endanger healthcare for those not seeking abortions

The vague and narrow language used in abortion bans and their exceptions makes interpretation difficult for clinicians, and they may be confused about what constitutes a "medical emergency" or "life-threatening condition." This ambiguity can deter physicians from practicing in states with restrictive abortion laws, exacerbating existing disparities in access to obstetric care and adverse maternal and fetal outcomes.

Abortion bans can also have a chilling effect on physicians, making them reluctant to provide abortion care when pregnant patients present with serious medical conditions. This can result in a delay in care and create greater risks to the health of the pregnant person. Furthermore, abortion restrictions force providers to be hesitant about managing patients with certain medications, as the use of these medications may result in accusations of criminal activity despite providing best-practice care.

Additionally, abortion bans can negatively impact patients experiencing miscarriage or spontaneous abortion. Spontaneous pregnancy loss is clinically indistinguishable from medication-induced abortion, and patients presenting with bleeding in pregnancy or pregnancy loss are vulnerable to the threat of reporting, arrest, and detention, regardless of the cause of their symptoms. Abortion restrictions may also lead to a lack of training in pregnancy termination and miscarriage management for obstetrics and gynecology providers, resulting in lower-quality care for patients.

Lastly, abortion bans can have wider effects on the healthcare system beyond reproductive care. For example, there have been reports of patients being denied access to necessary medications associated with abortion, such as methotrexate, misoprostol, and mifepristone, which are also used in the management of chronic diseases. The uncertainty surrounding these medications can be debilitating for patients with chronic conditions who rely on these prescriptions.

Abortion bans deny bodily autonomy

Bodily autonomy refers to an individual's right to self-governance and decision-making power over their body and health. This includes decisions about reproductive health, such as whether or not to continue a pregnancy. Recognising bodily autonomy as a fundamental human right is crucial for protecting the rights and well-being of individuals, particularly women, girls, and people who can become pregnant.

Abortion bans not only violate bodily autonomy but also endanger the lives and well-being of pregnant individuals. When abortion is illegal, people often resort to unsafe abortion methods, which can lead to serious health complications and even death. Restrictive abortion laws disproportionately impact marginalised communities, including people on low incomes, refugees, migrants, LGBTIQA+ individuals, and racialised and Indigenous people, who face additional barriers to accessing safe abortion services.

Additionally, abortion bans can have far-reaching social and economic consequences. Denying access to abortion can lead to increased household poverty, negatively impacting the well-being of existing children, and making it more difficult for individuals to continue their education or participate in the workforce. It can also contribute to gender inequality and reinforce systemic injustices.

Furthermore, abortion bans can create a culture of stigma and criminalisation surrounding abortion, making it more challenging for individuals to seek safe abortion services and increasing the risk of unsafe abortions. The criminalisation of abortion not only affects those seeking abortions but also healthcare providers, who may face legal repercussions for providing abortion care.

The impact of abortion bans extends beyond the individual and can have societal implications. By denying bodily autonomy and restricting access to safe abortion services, abortion bans can hinder social progress, economic growth, and the advancement of gender equality. It is essential to recognise the far-reaching consequences of abortion bans and to advocate for reproductive justice and the protection of bodily autonomy as a fundamental human right.

Abortion laws vary considerably between jurisdictions

Abortion laws vary significantly between jurisdictions, ranging from outright prohibition of the procedure to public funding of abortion. The availability of safe abortion services also varies across the world and is primarily found in places where abortion is legal.

In the US, abortion laws are determined at the state level, with some states prohibiting the procedure and others safeguarding it. The Supreme Court's June 2022 ruling to overturn Roe v. Wade shifted the legal battle over abortion rights to the individual states. This has resulted in a patchwork of abortion laws across the country, with varying levels of access and restriction.

In contrast, Canada stands out as the only country that has effectively decriminalized abortion. Abortion in Canada is not restricted and is available on request, without stipulations as to who must provide it or where. As a result, abortion is easily accessible, and opposition to abortion has never gained a strong foothold.

The laws and restrictions surrounding abortion differ greatly across the world, and few existing laws adequately address the issue. Historically, abortion was legally restricted in almost every country, primarily due to concerns about the dangerous nature of the procedure and the belief that abortion was a sin or a form of moral transgression. However, with advancements in medical technology, abortion is now one of the safest medical procedures when performed following the World Health Organization's (WHO) guidelines.

The United Nations Population Division categorizes legal systems regarding abortion into three main categories: common law, civil law, and Islamic law. Common law, prevalent in former British colonies such as the US, Australia, and India, often imposes criminal sanctions on abortion. Civil law, found in countries like France, Spain, and their former colonies, as well as Turkey and Japan, may also restrict abortion but to a lesser extent. Islamic law, followed by countries in North Africa, Western Asia, and some predominantly Muslim populations, influences personal law and further complicates abortion access.

Despite global efforts to reform abortion laws, the road to law reform is long and challenging. Advocates for abortion rights must navigate political, health system, legal, and socio-cultural complexities to bring about meaningful change. The success of law reform depends on building a critical mass of support from various allies, including parliamentarians, health professionals, legal experts, women's groups, and the women themselves.

The impact of restrictive abortion laws can be devastating, especially for marginalized communities. In places where abortion is criminalized, stigmatized, or restricted, people often resort to unsafe abortions, leading to fatal consequences such as maternal deaths and disabilities. Additionally, restrictive abortion laws can create barriers to accessing safe and timely abortion care, violating a range of human rights for women and girls.

The debate around abortion is deeply divisive, centering on moral, legal, medical, and religious aspects. Pro-choice supporters advocate for individuals' right to make their own reproductive health decisions, while pro-life advocates prioritize the rights of the fetus as a human being. The terms "pro-choice" and "pro-life" themselves are considered loaded, with each side attempting to validate their stance while invalidating the other's.

The abortion debate extends beyond legal and moral arguments, with practical considerations also at play. For example, libertarian principles may oppose taxpayer funding for abortion based on limited government and personal responsibility. Additionally, the availability of safe and legal abortion is impacted by factors such as cost, distance to services, and the refusal of medical staff to perform abortions based on personal conscience or religious beliefs.

The criminalization of abortion has far-reaching consequences, affecting not only the physical and mental well-being of women and girls but also their social and economic situations. It reinforces stigma, marginalization, and discrimination, trapping individuals in cycles of poverty and hindering their ability to exercise reproductive autonomy.

Frequently asked questions