Immigration's Criminalization: Laws, Borders, And Human Rights

Immigration law has become increasingly criminalized, with the federal government using criminal courts to punish people for immigration violations. This has resulted in tens of thousands of migrants and asylum seekers facing criminal prosecution and incarceration, with serious consequences for their families and communities. The crossover between immigration and criminal law is a complex area, with unjust laws and harsh penalties imposed on those seeking a better life in a new country. This has led to mass incarceration, family separation, and the wasting of vast resources on federal criminal prosecutions and incarceration. The criminalization of immigration has raised concerns about due process, racial profiling, and the impact on vulnerable individuals fleeing persecution or torture.

The criminalization of migration

History of Criminalization of Migration in the US

The roots of immigration law in the United States can be traced back to the country's early formation. The Constitution grants Congress the power to enact laws governing the naturalization of non-citizens, highlighting the importance of immigration and citizenship. The Naturalization Act of 1790 set the precedent that immigration status, especially citizenship, was a privilege granted at the discretion of the government. Over time, immigration law has evolved into a complex area of civil law, reflecting the notion that immigration is a type of public benefit.

Impact of Criminalization of Migration

Legal Consequences of Criminalization of Migration

Financial Costs of Criminalization of Migration

Criticisms of Criminalization of Migration

The impact of immigration law on racialized communities

Immigration law in the United States has a long and complex history, with the country's first immigration law passed in 1790. This law set a process for granting naturalized citizenship to immigrants who had resided in the country for at least two years. However, it restricted eligibility to "free white persons", effectively excluding Native Americans, indentured servants, and both enslaved and free Black people. Over time, various amendments and policies have been introduced, often reflecting the racial biases of the time.

Historically, immigration laws have been manipulated to serve those in power and uphold a system of structural racism. For example, in the 1800s, Chinese immigrants were welcomed to work in various industries but were later excluded by Congress when fears grew that they were taking over jobs from white Americans. Similarly, during the Great Depression, Mexican immigrants were targeted and blamed for economic troubles, leading to the deportation of around one million people of Mexican descent, many of whom were U.S. citizens.

Today, the consequences of unauthorized entry are far harsher for people of color, particularly Latinos, than they were for white Europeans in the past. The toughening of immigration laws has coincided with a shift in the demographics of immigrants, with increasing numbers arriving from Latin America, Asia, and Africa. This has fueled racialized debates, primarily targeted at Latinos, and contributed to the rise of anti-immigrant sentiment.

The current immigration enforcement system in the United States is extensive and involves both federal and local agencies. This has led to a higher likelihood of apprehension for undocumented immigrants, who are then unable to adjust their legal status. The punitive nature of immigration policies has not only affected individuals but also their families, including an estimated six million U.S. citizen or lawfully present family members who face the constant threat of family separation through deportation.

The legal status of asylum seekers

In the United States, asylum seekers have a legal right to seek protection at the border. They can do so by arriving at a designated "port of entry" and requesting to be screened by U.S. officials, or by entering the country without prior inspection and declaring their fear of persecution. However, asylum seekers are subject to criminal background and security checks, and they must navigate a complex and lengthy process involving multiple government agencies to prove their case.

The U.S. immigration law criminalizes asylum seekers through a series of laws and harsh penalties. For example, Sections 1325 and 1326 of the U.S. Code make it a federal crime to enter or re-enter the country without authorization, which has led to the mass incarceration and separation of families. Asylum seekers may face detention and deportation, which can cause trauma and separate families.

To be granted asylum in the U.S., individuals must prove their case and demonstrate a well-founded fear of persecution. They can apply for asylum by filing a Form I-589, Application for Asylum and for Withholding of Removal, within 1 year of their arrival. If granted asylum, individuals are immediately authorized to work and may petition to bring their spouses and children to the U.S.

It is important to note that the legal status of asylum seekers is a dynamic and evolving issue, and policies and procedures may change over time. Asylum seekers face many challenges and obstacles, but they contribute significantly to their new communities and economies.

The role of the Executive Branch in enforcing immigration law

The Executive Branch, led by the President, plays a significant role in enforcing immigration law in the United States. The President is responsible for enforcing federal laws, including those related to immigration. They have the power to issue executive orders, memoranda, and proclamations, which are directives followed by the Executive Branch and its agencies.

In recent years, due to the inability of Congress to pass comprehensive immigration reform, presidents have increasingly turned to executive orders to alter the enforcement of immigration laws. For example, President Obama created the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program through an executive order, protecting certain individuals who entered the US as children from deportation and allowing them to apply for work authorization. President Trump also issued multiple executive orders to limit immigration, including the controversial "Travel Ban" targeting people from Muslim-majority countries.

The Executive Branch includes various agencies that administer and enforce immigration laws. These include the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), which houses Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP), the Department of State, the Department of Justice, the Department of Labor, and the Department of Health and Human Services. These agencies pass rules and regulations to implement Congress's immigration laws and have the power to make specific decisions on immigration matters, such as granting Temporary Protected Status (TPS) to certain countries.

The Executive Branch's role in enforcing immigration law is balanced by the other branches of government. The Legislative Branch, or Congress, has the power to make and change immigration laws, and the Judicial Branch, or the Supreme Court, can interpret these laws and restrict the Executive Branch's actions through rulings and injunctions.

The consequences of criminal convictions for immigrants

Impact on Visa Holders

For non-citizens on temporary visas, such as students, workers, or tourists, criminal charges can have life-altering consequences. A criminal charge may lead to the immediate revocation of a visa, stripping the individual of their lawful status. Even dismissed charges or an acquittal can raise red flags in future immigration proceedings. The complexities of immigration law mean that even minor infractions can trigger a cascade of legal challenges.

Deportation Risks for Permanent Residents

Lawful permanent residents, or green card holders, are also vulnerable to the harsh realities of the US immigration system when facing criminal convictions. Certain crimes, particularly aggravated felonies and crimes of moral turpitude, can initiate deportation proceedings, even for long-term residents. The term "aggravated felony" in immigration law encompasses a broad range of offenses that may not be considered felonies under criminal law. Crimes of moral turpitude involve conduct deemed inherently base, vile, or depraved.

Asylum Seekers and Criminal Convictions

Asylum seekers face significant challenges when entangled with the criminal justice system. A criminal conviction can be a significant barrier to obtaining asylum and may lead to a finding of inadmissibility or deportability. The US government often bars asylum seekers with criminal records, particularly those convicted of serious crimes or multiple offenses, from relief. This delicate balance puts those fleeing persecution at risk of being returned to dangerous situations.

Drug Offenses and Immigration Fallout

Drug-related offenses carry stringent immigration consequences. A conviction, except for a single incident of simple possession of a small amount of marijuana, can lead to deportation and ineligibility for most immigration benefits. The intersection of the war on drugs and immigration law often results in the mandatory detention and removal of non-citizens.

Collateral Consequences

The intersection of immigration and criminal law presents unique challenges for criminal defense attorneys representing non-citizens. A criminal conviction can have collateral consequences that jeopardize an immigrant's status, making them deportable or inadmissible. The type of crime committed determines the specific consequences, with crimes of moral turpitude typically triggering adverse consequences such as inadmissibility and removal.

Decriminalizing Immigration

There are ongoing efforts and advocacy for decriminalizing immigration and reforming unjust laws that criminalize immigrants, refugees, and asylum seekers. The New Way Forward Act is an example of proposed legislation aimed at separating immigration laws from the criminal legal system, ending mandatory detention, and providing due process protections.

Frequently asked questions