Texas Abortion Law: Death Penalty's Origin Story

In May 2024, Texas Republicans voted on a proposal to apply the death penalty to abortion providers, suggesting a repeal of the state law that protects abortion providers from being charged with homicide. The proposal, which was voted on during the Texas GOP convention, also proclaimed that abortion is not healthcare, it is homicide. While the proposal does not explicitly mention abortion patients, it has sparked concerns about the implications for those seeking abortions. The Texas abortion law, which prohibits almost all abortions, has faced legal challenges and criticism for its ambiguous wording, prompting expecting mothers with health complications to leave the state or risk their health by giving birth.

Texas Republicans' stance on the death penalty for abortion providers

Texas Republicans have expressed their support for applying the death penalty to abortion providers. During the Texas GOP convention in 2024, Republican delegates voted on a party platform that characterises abortion as "homicide" and recommends repealing a state law that shields abortion providers from homicide charges. Capital murder in Texas is punishable by death.

The Texas GOP platform also calls for "legislation to abolish abortion by immediately securing the right to life and equal protection of the laws to all preborn children from the moment of fertilization". This language is reflective of the beliefs of "abortion abolitionists", a fringe, hardline anti-abortion group that has gained more influence in recent years. Abortion abolitionists argue that if a fetus is a person and abortion is murder, then abortion patients should be punished as murderers.

While the platform does not explicitly mention abortion patients, it effectively defines fetuses as people with full legal rights, which could have far-reaching implications for Texas law. For instance, it could hinder access to in vitro fertilisation (IVF) treatments.

The Texas GOP platform also includes other controversial stances, such as referring to homosexuality as an "abnormal lifestyle choice" and labelling gender-affirming care for minors as "child abuse".

It is important to note that the Texas GOP platform is not a legislative agenda, and these proposals may not become bills or pass into law. However, Texas has been a key state for activists and lawmakers seeking to restrict reproductive rights, with many bills originating in Texas being exported to other state legislatures across the US.

The Texas Heartbeat Act

The Act makes no exceptions for pregnancies resulting from rape or incest. However, it does allow for abortions in cases of medical emergencies, where a physician believes that a medical emergency exists that necessitates the abortion. In such cases, the physician must document the emergency in both the patient's and their own medical records.

The Act provides for a minimum award of $10,000 in damages, as well as legal fees, to the person who files the lawsuit if they are successful. However, it is important to note that the Act does not create or recognise a right to abortion before a fetal heartbeat is detected, and it does not authorise the initiation of legal action against the woman on whom the abortion is performed.

Texas abortion EMTALA case

The Texas abortion EMTALA case centres on whether states with abortion bans must allow emergency room physicians to provide abortions in critical cases. The federal Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) requires hospitals that receive federal funding to stabilise all patients in crisis. The Biden administration has clarified that this mandate includes abortions when that is the care needed.

The Texas Supreme Court issued its ruling in Zurawski v. State on May 31, 2024. In this case, twenty women and two doctors claimed that the Texas abortion law's restrictions caused significant harm by preventing doctors from performing medically necessary abortions. In August, a judge in Travis County issued a temporary injunction, allowing Texans with complicated pregnancies to get abortions if their doctor believed it was necessary. However, the Texas Attorney General's Office appealed this decision, and the Texas Supreme Court reviewed the case. The Attorney General argued that the high bar set by Texas for qualifying for an abortion is constitutional. The plaintiffs' lawyers countered that the law's vague language leaves doctors unsure of when they can act, endangering women's lives.

The Texas Supreme Court concluded that the plaintiffs had not shown that the Texas abortion law was unconstitutional. They wrote that Texas law permits a physician to address the risk posed by a life-threatening condition before a woman suffers the consequences of that risk.

On October 7, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to intervene in the Texas emergency abortion case. The justices rejected the Biden administration's request to block a lower court ruling barring emergency abortions that would conflict with Texas state law. The Supreme Court's decision left in place a lower-court ruling that rejected the Biden administration's claim that federal law requires access to emergency abortion care, even in states that restrict the procedure. This decision surprised court-watchers, as it differed from the Court's handling of a similar case in Idaho.

The Texas abortion law prohibits physicians from performing abortions once a fetal heartbeat is detected. The law criminalises performing an abortion from the moment of fertilisation unless the pregnant patient faces a life-threatening physical condition aggravated by, caused by, or arising from a pregnancy. The law does not include an exception for rape or incest. While the law allows for exceptions when the patient's life is at risk, physicians have stated that these exceptions are incredibly difficult to utilise, and they are often forced to delay care until the patient's condition has deteriorated.

Texas abortion law and emergency rooms

Texas abortion laws are among the most restrictive in the United States. The state enacted a law in 2022 that prohibits almost all abortions, except in certain circumstances. Under Texas law, abortions are banned once a fetal heartbeat is detected, which usually occurs around six weeks into a pregnancy. This law, known as the Texas Heartbeat Bill, went into effect on September 1, 2021, and sparked heated debates and legal challenges across the nation.

The Texas abortion law makes it a criminal offense to perform, induce, or attempt an abortion. The law also imposes various penalties on those who provide prohibited abortions, including criminal charges, civil penalties, and license revocation. However, the law does not apply to the patient receiving the abortion, who cannot be prosecuted or sued.

In terms of emergency rooms and abortion, there has been ongoing debate and legal action regarding the application of federal law in Texas. The Biden administration argues that the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) requires emergency rooms to provide abortions if a pregnant patient's health or life is at serious risk, even in states like Texas where abortion is banned. EMTALA applies to emergency rooms that receive Medicare funding, which includes most hospitals.

However, the Supreme Court has declined to intervene in this matter, leaving in place a lower-court ruling that rejected the Biden administration's claim. This means that, as of now, Texas hospitals are not federally required to provide pregnancy terminations when they violate the state's abortion ban, even in emergency situations.

The Texas abortion law does include some exceptions for situations where the life or health of the pregnant patient is at risk. In these cases, a licensed physician must perform the abortion and must try to save the life of the fetus unless doing so would increase the risk to the patient. However, the law does not define what constitutes a "substantial impairment of a major bodily function," leaving some ambiguity.

The interpretation and application of Texas abortion laws, especially in emergency situations, remain highly contested. While the Supreme Court's decision upholds the state's abortion ban in emergency rooms, it is important to note that the specific circumstances and exceptions outlined in the law may still allow for abortions in certain emergency cases as determined by medical professionals.

Texas abortion law and the Supreme Court

Texas abortion laws have been the subject of much debate and legal challenges in recent years, with the state enacting laws that prohibit most abortions and impose harsh penalties on providers. The Texas Heartbeat Bill, which went into effect on September 1, 2021, bans abortions once a fetal heartbeat is detected, which is usually around six weeks into a pregnancy. This law sparked heated debates and legal challenges across the nation.

The Texas abortion law makes it a second-degree felony to "perform, induce, or attempt an abortion" and the penalty is increased to a first-degree felony if the unborn child dies as a result. The law also allows for civil lawsuits against abortion providers, with a $10,000 civil penalty, and administrative penalties, including the mandatory revocation of medical licenses. Additionally, Texas Republicans have proposed applying the death penalty to abortion providers, suggesting that "abortion is not healthcare, it is homicide".

The Supreme Court's ruling on Dobbs v. Jackson in 2022 triggered the Texas law, overturning Roe v. Wade and allowing states to set their own abortion laws. However, the Supreme Court has also declined to hear several cases related to abortion access and emergency abortion care, leaving unanswered questions about the application of federal law in states with abortion bans. For example, in October 2024, the Supreme Court left in place a court order blocking the Biden administration from requiring Texas hospitals to provide emergency abortion care, even in medical emergencies.

The Texas Supreme Court has also weighed in on the state's abortion law, ruling in the case of Zurawski v. State in May 2024. In this case, the Court upheld the Texas abortion law, finding that the plaintiffs had not shown that the law was unconstitutional. Additionally, in December 2023, the Texas Supreme Court recognized that only a doctor could decide whether an abortion was necessary to save the life or health of the pregnant patient, and that a court pre-authorization was not required in such cases.

Frequently asked questions