The law of armed conflict, or international humanitarian law (IHL), is a set of rules that seeks to limit the effects of war by protecting non-combatants and restricting the means and methods of warfare. It is inspired by humanitarian considerations and the mitigation of human suffering. IHL is made up of treaties, such as the Geneva Conventions, and customary international law. It is universal and applies to all parties fighting in a conflict, including governmental forces and non-state armed groups. While the law of armed conflict is distinct from international human rights law, the two branches of law are complementary and overlap in some areas. The law of armed conflict is also distinct from the domestic law of a particular belligerent to a conflict, which may provide additional legal limits to the conduct or justification of war.
Characteristics | Values |
---|---|
Scope | International humanitarian law applies to all parties fighting in a conflict, including governmental forces and non-state armed groups. |
Applicability | The law applies only in situations of armed conflict. |
Treaties | The Geneva Conventions, the Hague Conventions, and their Additional Protocols are the main treaties of international humanitarian law. |
Customary Law | Customary international law fills gaps where treaties are not applicable or where treaty law is less developed. |
Protected Persons | Civilians, medics, aid workers, wounded, sick, shipwrecked troops, prisoners of war, detainees, and other non-combatants are protected under international humanitarian law. |
Conduct of Hostilities | The principles of distinction, proportionality, precaution, and specific protection guide the conduct of hostilities. |
Weapons | The use of certain weapons is prohibited or restricted, including those that are indiscriminate, cause unnecessary suffering, or have unacceptable harm. |
Punishment | Violations of international humanitarian law can result in punishment, including war crimes for serious violations. |
What You'll Learn
The law of war's applicability to non-state armed groups
The applicability of the law of war to non-state armed groups is a complex issue that has evolved over time. While there is no internationally agreed-upon definition of non-state armed groups, they generally refer to non-state parties involved in international or non-international armed conflicts. These groups play a significant role in contemporary conflicts, and their actions can have a significant impact on the nature of the conflict and the responsibilities of the states involved.
Under international humanitarian law (IHL), also known as the You may want to see also The law of war, or international humanitarian law (IHL), is a set of rules that seeks to limit the effects of armed conflict and protect those who are not involved in the fighting or are no longer able to take part in hostilities. This includes civilians, medics, aid workers, wounded soldiers, prisoners of war, and other detainees. IHL applies only in situations of armed conflict and offers two systems of protection: one for international armed conflict (IAC) and another for non-international armed conflict (NIAC). IACs are armed conflicts between two or more states, while NIACs involve governmental armed forces fighting against non-state armed groups or such groups fighting each other. IHL is universal, and all parties fighting in a conflict are obliged to respect it. The Geneva Conventions, which are central to IHL, have been ratified by 196 states, making it a widely accepted body of law. The conventions outline the rules of war, which include: IHL also sets out rules for the treatment of prisoners of war, the protection of refugees and internally displaced persons, and the conduct of hostilities, such as the prohibition of attacks on civilian objects and the protection of cultural property. The law of war has evolved over time to address the rapid changes in weaponry and the increasing technological advancements in warfare. While the law of war cannot prevent a state or individual from using force in self-defence, it aims to limit the suffering caused to combatants and civilians by imposing restrictions on the methods and means of warfare. The protection of civilians under IHL is of utmost importance, and parties to an armed conflict must take all feasible precautions to avoid harming civilians and civilian objects. Civilians are protected against direct attack unless they directly participate in hostilities. However, even if civilians are inadvertently harmed by an attack on a military target, parties to the conflict must still take measures to minimise harm and distinguish between civilians and combatants. You may want to see also The law of war, also known as international humanitarian law, is a set of rules that seeks to limit the effects of armed conflict. It applies to all parties fighting in a conflict, including governmental forces and non-state armed groups. The law of war is distinct from other bodies of law, such as the domestic law of a particular belligerent to a conflict. Prisoners of war are combatants who have fallen into enemy hands in an international armed conflict. They are protected under humanitarian law, which includes the Geneva Conventions and their Additional Protocols. The Third Geneva Convention of 1949 specifically regulates the treatment of prisoners of war, and the definition of a prisoner of war is derived from the definition of a combatant. Civilians who participate in hostilities also benefit from guarantees of treatment in international and non-international armed conflicts. Prisoners of war must be treated humanely in all circumstances and are protected against any act of violence, intimidation, insults, and public curiosity. The law of war also defines minimum conditions of internment for prisoners of war, addressing issues such as accommodation, food, clothing, hygiene, and medical care. Prisoners of war cannot be prosecuted for taking a direct part in hostilities, but they may be prosecuted for possible war crimes. Their internment is not a form of punishment but aims to prevent them from further participation in the conflict. The Additional Protocol to the Geneva Conventions, adopted in 1977, takes a different approach to the question of prisoners of war. It enumerates the categories of persons who must be protected under the status of prisoners of war if captured by an adverse party. The goal is to ensure that individuals are not denied this status if an authority chooses a restrictive interpretation of the Third Geneva Convention. The law of war is applicable to prisoners of war and provides them with certain rights and protections. These include the right to be treated humanely, protection against violence and intimidation, the right to respect for their persons and honour, and the right to correspond with their families. Prisoners of war are also entitled to certain working conditions and fair wages if they are employed during their captivity. The law of war also sets out specific provisions for the treatment of female prisoners of war, the sick and wounded, and children. It prohibits discrimination based on sex or gender and addresses the risks faced by women in armed conflict, including sexual violence. Children are especially vulnerable in armed conflicts, and the law of war provides them with general protection as civilians and special protections, such as access to food and healthcare. In summary, the law of war is applicable to prisoners of war and provides them with a set of rights and protections aimed at mitigating the hardships of war. These include the right to humane treatment, protection against violence and intimidation, and access to basic needs such as food, clothing, and medical care. The law of war also sets out specific provisions for vulnerable groups, such as women and children, and addresses the issue of discrimination and sexual violence. You may want to see also International humanitarian law (IHL) applies to all parties fighting in a conflict, regardless of whether they are governmental forces or non-state armed groups. It is a set of rules that seeks to limit the effects of armed conflict for humanitarian reasons. A territory is considered "occupied" when it is placed under the authority of a hostile foreign armed force. The occupation extends only to the territory where such authority has been established and can be exercised. When a state consents to the presence of foreign troops, there is no occupation. The rights and duties of occupying forces are generally to take the necessary steps to restore and maintain law and order and public life while respecting the laws in force, unless absolutely prevented from doing so. This includes obligations related to respect for human rights, law, and order, in addition to respect for relevant provisions of humanitarian law related to occupation. The basic obligations of the occupying power under IHL are to maintain law and order and public life in the occupied territory. In situations where armed resistance is strong enough to prevent the occupying power from efficiently controlling the territory, general provisions of IHL applicable to international armed conflict continue to apply. In cases where occupying forces do not succeed in establishing or exercising authority over a certain territory, for example, due to hostile acts committed by combatants of the occupied territory, these areas are not considered occupied territories but invaded territories, or battlefields, and the rules of armed conflict apply. You may want to see also The law of war, or international humanitarian law, is a component of international law that regulates the conditions for initiating war and the conduct of hostilities. The law of war is universal and applies to all parties fighting in a conflict, be they governmental forces or non-state armed groups. The law of war imposes limits on the choice of weapons, means, and methods of warfare. This includes general rules that prohibit weapons that are indiscriminate in nature, and principles and rules governing the conduct of hostilities, which primarily protect civilians. The law of war also prohibits weapons that cause superfluous injury or unnecessary suffering, which also protect combatants. The use of certain weapons is prohibited or restricted. This includes weapons that are indiscriminate in nature, such as very large aerial bombs or salvos of unguided rockets, which cannot be used in a manner that distinguishes between civilians and combatants or between civilian objects and military objectives. Weapons that have been banned by specific treaties include: The law of war also requires states to carry out a legal review to determine whether a new weapon's use might be prohibited by international law in some or all circumstances. You may want to see also The Law of Armed Conflict, also known as International Humanitarian Law (IHL), is a set of rules that seeks to limit the effects of armed conflict by protecting non-combatants and restricting the means and methods of warfare. IHL is universal and applies to all parties fighting in a conflict, including governmental forces and non-state armed groups. The Geneva Conventions, central to IHL, have been ratified by 196 states, making it a widely recognised body of law. IHL applies only in situations of armed conflict and offers two systems of protection: one for international armed conflict and another for non-international armed conflict. The five most commonly cited principles of IHL are military necessity, distinction, proportionality, humanity (or unnecessary suffering), and honour (or chivalry). Civilians are protected from direct attack under IHL. Parties to an armed conflict must take all feasible precautions to distinguish between civilians and combatants and must not carry out attacks that fail to distinguish between the two or cause disproportionate harm to civilians.Castle Law: Children's Rights and Protections Explored
The law of war's applicability to civilians
HIPAA Laws: Do They Apply to Sober Living Environments?
The law of war's applicability to prisoners of war
Miscarriages and Abortion Laws: Overlapping Boundaries?
The law of war's applicability to occupied territories
Employment Discrimination Law: Resident Aliens' Rights Explored
The law of war's applicability to the use of weapons
The Law and Work: What's the Verdict?
Frequently asked questions