Loughlin's Legal Troubles: Understanding The Charges

Actress Lori Loughlin and her husband, fashion designer Mossimo Giannulli, were charged in the college admissions scandal known as Operation Varsity Blues. The couple allegedly paid a $500,000 bribe to have their daughters accepted to the University of Southern California as crew recruits, despite neither daughter participating in the sport. Loughlin and Giannulli pleaded not guilty to the charges of conspiracy to commit money laundering and conspiracy to commit mail fraud. If convicted, they could face up to 20 years in prison per charge.

Conspiracy to commit mail fraud

To prove conspiracy to commit mail fraud, several elements must be present. Firstly, there must be an agreement or plan between two or more individuals to commit mail fraud. This agreement can be expressed directly or implied indirectly and does not need to be formal. Secondly, each participant must have the intent to commit mail fraud and must knowingly and willingly join the conspiracy, understanding its objectives. Lastly, an overt act must be taken in furtherance of the conspiracy, such as purchasing supplies or initiating communications related to the criminal activity.

The consequences of a conspiracy to commit mail fraud conviction can be severe. In the United States, individuals found guilty of this offense face up to 20 years in prison and/or financial penalties, including restitution and forfeiture of profits gained through unlawful activity. In Loughlin's case, she faced a maximum sentence of 40 years in prison if convicted of conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud.

It is important to note that conspiracy to commit mail fraud is a complex legal matter, and the specific elements and penalties may vary depending on the jurisdiction and the laws under which the case is prosecuted. Seeking legal guidance as soon as possible is crucial to understanding one's rights and navigating the legal complexities.

Conspiracy to commit money laundering

> "Whoever, knowing that the property involved in a financial transaction represents the proceeds of some form of unlawful activity, conducts or attempts to conduct such a financial transaction which in fact involves the proceeds of specified unlawful activity... shall be sentenced to a fine of not more than $500,000 or twice the value of the property involved in the transaction, whichever is greater, or imprisonment for not more than twenty years, or both."

The law further states that:

> "Whoever, with the intent to promote the carrying on of specified unlawful activity... conducts or attempts to conduct a financial transaction involving property represented to be the proceeds of specified unlawful activity, or property used to conduct or facilitate specified unlawful activity, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than 20 years, or both."

In the case of Loughlin, she and her husband allegedly made payments to a consultant, Rick Singer, to get their daughters into USC by using him as a "facilitator" who had helped hundreds of other students gain admission to colleges. However, Loughlin and her husband claimed that they were unaware of the exact methods Singer would use and that they believed their actions were similar to those of other parents who take extraordinary steps to help their children get into top colleges.

Despite this defence, the charges against Loughlin and her husband were severe, and she faced up to 40 years in prison if sentenced to the maximum extent of the law.

Fraud and bribery

In 2019, Lori Loughlin and her husband, Mossimo Giannulli, were charged with fraud and bribery in the college admissions scandal known as Operation Varsity Blues. The couple was accused of paying $500,000 in bribes to have their daughters accepted to the University of Southern California (USC) as crew recruits, despite neither daughter participating in crew.

Loughlin and Giannulli pleaded not guilty to the charges, claiming they were unaware that their actions were illegal. They argued that they believed they were making a donation to the university and did not know the specifics of how their money would be used. However, prosecutors alleged that the couple conspired to commit mail and wire fraud and engaged in honest services fraud.

The case against Loughlin and Giannulli highlighted the issue of fraud and bribery in the college admissions process. Fraud occurs when an individual or organization deliberately deceives others to gain an advantage, such as securing admission to a university. In this case, Loughlin and Giannulli were accused of providing false information and making payments to have their daughters admitted to USC under false pretenses. Bribery, on the other hand, involves offering something of value to influence the behaviour of another person. In this context, bribery refers to the couple's alleged payments to university officials or coaches in exchange for their daughters' admission to USC.

The consequences of fraud and bribery can be severe, with potential penalties including prison time and fines. In the case of Loughlin and Giannulli, they faced up to 40 years in prison and millions of dollars in fines if found guilty on all charges. The scandal also had a significant impact on their public image and led to their daughters' departure from USC.

To combat fraud and bribery in the college admissions process, it is essential to have transparent and fair admission policies. Universities and colleges should ensure that their admission criteria are clearly communicated and consistently applied. Additionally, increasing awareness among students and parents about the potential consequences of engaging in fraudulent or bribery activities can help deter such behaviours.

Conspiracy to defraud

The defraud clause prohibits conspiracies to defraud the United States and creates a separate offence from the "offence clause". Both offences require the traditional elements of a conspiracy, including an illegal agreement, criminal intent, and proof of an overt act.

The definition of "defraud" has been interpreted by the Supreme Court in two early cases, Hass v. Henkel (1910) and Hammerschmidt v. United States (1924). In Hass, the Court stated that the statute includes "any conspiracy for the purpose of impairing, obstructing or defeating the lawful function of any department of government". In Hammerschmidt, Chief Justice Taft defined "defraud" as "to cheat the Government out of property or money", or "to interfere with or obstruct one of its lawful governmental functions by deceit, craft or trickery, or [...] by means that are dishonest".

The general purpose of the law is to protect governmental functions from frustration and distortion through deceptive practices. The law reaches "any conspiracy for the purpose of impairing, obstructing or defeating the lawful function of any department of Government". It is not necessary that the government suffers a financial or pecuniary loss, only that its legitimate official actions and purposes are defeated by misrepresentation or dishonest means.

Lori Loughlin was charged with conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud in relation to the college admissions scandal. She allegedly paid $500,000 to have her daughters accepted to USC as crew recruits, even though they did not participate in the sport. Loughlin pleaded not guilty, claiming that she was under the impression she might be breaking rules, but not laws.

Racketeering conspiracy

RICO prosecutions typically involve a range of illegal activities, including extortion, money laundering, and human trafficking, all connected under an organised enterprise. This makes racketeering conspiracy a federal crime because the criminal activities often span state and national boundaries and have a significant economic impact.

To prove a RICO charge, the prosecution must establish that a pattern of racketeering activity occurred within a ten-year period. Racketeering activity encompasses a broad range of criminal acts, including but not limited to murder, kidnapping, gambling, arson, robbery, bribery, extortion, and drug dealing.

In the context of the college admissions scandal, Lori Loughlin and her husband, Mossimo Giannulli, were charged with racketeering conspiracy. They allegedly paid $500,000 to have their daughters accepted to the University of Southern California (USC) as crew recruits, despite neither of them participating in the sport. While Loughlin and Giannulli pleaded not guilty, claiming they were unaware of breaking any laws, they faced severe penalties, including potential prison sentences.

Frequently asked questions